A.I.dvisor tells us that QVCGB and CDOAF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QVCGB and CDOAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVCGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVCGB | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| CDOAF - QVCGB | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HOUR - QVCGB | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| BYON - QVCGB | 22% Poorly correlated | -12.05% | ||
| CART - QVCGB | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.98% | ||
| NEGG - QVCGB | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.28% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVCGB | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| QVCGB | 100% | -1.52% |
| video theme (34 stocks) | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.04% |
| e-commerce theme (11 stocks) | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.78% |
| online theme (93 stocks) | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.02% |
| distribution theme (11 stocks) | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.13% |
| catalog theme (7 stocks) | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.46% |
More | ||