MGDDF CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND Forecast, Technical & Fundamental Analysis

MGDDF in upward trend: 10-day moving average broke above 50-day moving average on July 16, 2025

The 10-day moving average for MGDDF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on July 16, 2025. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 20 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MGDDF just turned positive on July 21, 2025. Looking at past instances where MGDDF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

MGDDF moved above its 50-day moving average on July 25, 2025 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MGDDF advanced for three days, in of 88 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 248 cases where MGDDF Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 69 cases where MGDDF's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on July 25, 2025. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MGDDF as a result. In of 107 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.345) is normal, around the industry mean (12.597). P/E Ratio (11.025) is within average values for comparable stocks, (41.812). MGDDF's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (0.991). Dividend Yield (0.040) settles around the average of (0.029) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.852) is also within normal values, averaging (21.251).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. MGDDF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MGDDF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.