Insurance Australia Group is the biggest domestic general insurer by gross written premium operating in Australia and New Zealand... Show more
The 50-day moving average for IAUGF moved below the 200-day moving average on January 20, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 10-day moving average for IAUGF crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on January 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 10 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IAUGF's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 13 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on January 29, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on IAUGF as a result. In of 26 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for IAUGF just turned positive on January 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where IAUGF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 29 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
IAUGF moved above its 50-day moving average on January 26, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.570) is normal, around the industry mean (2.233). P/E Ratio (13.850) is within average values for comparable stocks, (15.472). IAUGF's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.363). Dividend Yield (0.037) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.263) is also within normal values, averaging (1.502).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. IAUGF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 52, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry PropertyCasualtyInsurance