El Puerto de Liverpool SAB de CV is a retail company that operates throughout Mexico in three business segments: Liverpool, which offers clothing, home goods, furniture, and cosmetics in Liverpool stores as well as boutique locations; Suburbia, which includes Suburbia stores selling consumer products of its own brands; The credit segment is a complement to the Liverpool and Suburbia commercial segment... Show more
On November 12, 2025, the Stochastic Oscillator for ELPQF moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 19 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In of the 19 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over .
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2025. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ELPQF as a result. In of 26 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ELPQF just turned positive on November 07, 2025. Looking at past instances where ELPQF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 24 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
ELPQF moved above its 50-day moving average on November 12, 2025 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The RSI Indicator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The 50-day moving average for ELPQF moved below the 200-day moving average on October 15, 2025. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.739) is normal, around the industry mean (2.349). P/E Ratio (6.646) is within average values for comparable stocks, (71.096). ELPQF's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.576). Dividend Yield (0.030) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.568) is also within normal values, averaging (4.550).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 72, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. ELPQF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows