COSCO SHIPPING Development Co Ltd is a China-based company operating and managing container shipping... Show more
The Stochastic Oscillator for CITAF moved into oversold territory on July 03, 2025. Be on the watch for the price uptrend or consolidation in the future. At that time, consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on June 17, 2025. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CITAF as a result. In of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CITAF just turned positive on June 17, 2025. Looking at past instances where CITAF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
CITAF moved above its 50-day moving average on June 17, 2025 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CITAF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on June 20, 2025. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 21 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The 50-day moving average for CITAF moved above the 200-day moving average on June 30, 2025. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 11 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
CITAF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on June 17, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.472) is normal, around the industry mean (9.969). P/E Ratio (8.564) is within average values for comparable stocks, (62.376). CITAF's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (2.359). CITAF has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.047) as compared to the industry average of (0.018). P/S Ratio (0.524) is also within normal values, averaging (9.269).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CITAF’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CITAF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 61, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry AerospaceDefense