ZMPLF
Price
$7.79
Change
-$0.50 (-6.03%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
ZPHYF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ZMPLF vs ZPHYF

Header iconZMPLF vs ZPHYF Comparison
Open Charts ZMPLF vs ZPHYFBanner chart's image
Zimplats Holdings
Price$7.79
Change-$0.50 (-6.03%)
Volume$1.33K
Capitalization1.89B
Zephyr Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33K
Capitalization5.36M
ZMPLF vs ZPHYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ZMPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ZMPLF vs. ZPHYF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ZMPLF is a Hold and ZPHYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (ZMPLF: $7.79 vs. ZPHYF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: ZMPLF and ZPHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ZMPLF: 155% vs. ZPHYF: 124%
Market capitalization -- ZMPLF: $1.89B vs. ZPHYF: $5.36M
ZMPLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.89B. ZPHYF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ZMPLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZPHYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ZMPLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZPHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZMPLF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPHYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZMPLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPHYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ZMPLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZPHYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZMPLF is a better buy in the short-term than ZPHYF.

Price Growth

ZMPLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZPHYF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.98% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZMPLF($1.89B) has a higher market cap than ZPHYF($5.36M). ZPHYF YTD gains are higher at: 34.703 vs. ZMPLF (-14.583). ZMPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 660M vs. ZPHYF (-668.77K). ZMPLF has more cash in the bank: 378M vs. ZPHYF (195K). ZMPLF has higher revenues than ZPHYF: ZMPLF (1.2B) vs ZPHYF (0).
ZMPLFZPHYFZMPLF / ZPHYF
Capitalization1.89B5.36M35,235%
EBITDA660M-668.77K-98,689%
Gain YTD-14.58334.703-42%
P/E Ratio5.38N/A-
Revenue1.2B0-
Total Cash378M195K193,846%
Total Debt734KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZMPLF vs ZPHYF: Fundamental Ratings
ZMPLF
ZPHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZMPLF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHYF (28). This means that ZMPLF’s stock grew similarly to ZPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

ZMPLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHYF (100). This means that ZMPLF’s stock grew similarly to ZPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

ZMPLF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHYF (100). This means that ZMPLF’s stock grew similarly to ZPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPHYF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ZMPLF (63). This means that ZPHYF’s stock grew similarly to ZMPLF’s over the last 12 months.

ZMPLF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZPHYF (100). This means that ZMPLF’s stock grew significantly faster than ZPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZMPLFZPHYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ZMPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCRI87.180.90
+1.04%
Monarch Casino & Resort
EMCGU12.11N/A
N/A
Embrace Change Acquisition Corp
CCSI22.96-0.32
-1.37%
Consensus Cloud Solutions
TE1.25-0.05
-3.85%
T1 Energy Inc.
IPSC0.54-0.03
-5.74%
Century Therapeutics

ZMPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZMPLF and NPTLF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZMPLF and NPTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZMPLF
1D Price
Change %
ZMPLF100%
N/A
NPTLF - ZMPLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMAUF - ZMPLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
CYPMF - ZMPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVGAF - ZMPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-50.00%
RDEXF - ZMPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
More

ZPHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZPHYF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZPHYF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPHYF
1D Price
Change %
ZPHYF100%
N/A
AUMBF - ZPHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
GLDG - ZPHYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
ZIJMY - ZPHYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
ZMPLF - ZPHYF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIJMF - ZPHYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More