YUM
Price
$148.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
41.41B
16 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$46.83
Change
-$0.73 (-1.53%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
17.32B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

YUM vs YUMC

Header iconYUM vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts YUM vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Yum! Brands
Price$148.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$239
Capitalization41.41B
Yum China Holdings
Price$46.83
Change-$0.73 (-1.53%)
Volume$1.96M
Capitalization17.32B
YUM vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
YUM vs. YUMC commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is YUM is a Hold and YUMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (YUM: $148.08 vs. YUMC: $46.83)
Brand notoriety: YUM and YUMC are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: YUM: 0% vs. YUMC: 91%
Market capitalization -- YUM: $41.41B vs. YUMC: $17.32B
YUM [@Restaurants] is valued at $41.41B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $17.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

YUM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • YUM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

YUM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • YUM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the short-term than YUM.

Price Growth

YUM (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

YUM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.89% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($41.4B) has a higher market cap than YUMC($17.3B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: YUM (29.67) vs YUMC (19.59). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 11.441 vs. YUMC (-1.782). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.62B vs. YUMC (1.7B). YUMC has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. YUM (607M). YUMC has less debt than YUM: YUMC (2.37B) vs YUM (11.4B). YUMC has higher revenues than YUM: YUMC (11.3B) vs YUM (7.74B).
YUMYUMCYUM / YUMC
Capitalization41.4B17.3B239%
EBITDA2.62B1.7B154%
Gain YTD11.441-1.782-642%
P/E Ratio29.6719.59151%
Revenue7.74B11.3B68%
Total Cash607M1.99B30%
Total Debt11.4B2.37B481%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUM vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUM
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1077
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
1054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2123
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5024

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUMC's Valuation (32) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (39). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for YUMC (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (54). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (43). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (23). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
YUMYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGDG33.780.03
+0.09%
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
CAAA20.400.01
+0.05%
First Trust Commercial Mortg Opports ETF
XAPR35.200.02
+0.05%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Apr
DFEB44.98-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb
TDVI27.39-0.04
-0.15%
FT Vest Tech Div Trgt Inc ETF

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
N/A
MCD - YUM
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
QSR - YUM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
YUMC - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
DPZ - YUM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
PZZA - YUM
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
-1.55%
YUM - YUMC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QSR - YUMC
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
HDL - YUMC
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
ARCO - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
CNNE - YUMC
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More