WRLGF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
277.85M
WTHVF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

WRLGF vs WTHVF

Header iconWRLGF vs WTHVF Comparison
Open Charts WRLGF vs WTHVFBanner chart's image
WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES
Price$0.71
Change-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Volume$940.15K
Capitalization277.85M
Westhaven Gold
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$33.25K
Capitalization30.58M
WRLGF vs WTHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WRLGF vs. WTHVF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WRLGF is a Hold and WTHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (WRLGF: $0.71 vs. WTHVF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: WRLGF and WTHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WRLGF: 136% vs. WTHVF: 15%
Market capitalization -- WRLGF: $277.85M vs. WTHVF: $30.58M
WRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $277.85M. WTHVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $30.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WRLGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTHVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • WRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTHVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTHVF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WRLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTHVF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WTHVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTHVF is a better buy in the short-term than WRLGF.

Price Growth

WRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.81% price change this week, while WTHVF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRLGF($278M) has a higher market cap than WTHVF($30.6M). WTHVF YTD gains are higher at: 73.697 vs. WRLGF (69.048). WTHVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -99.84K vs. WRLGF (-79.23M). WRLGF has more cash in the bank: 23.7M vs. WTHVF (3.45M). WTHVF has less debt than WRLGF: WTHVF (204K) vs WRLGF (97.1M). WRLGF (0) and WTHVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
WRLGFWTHVFWRLGF / WTHVF
Capitalization278M30.6M908%
EBITDA-79.23M-99.84K79,359%
Gain YTD69.04873.69794%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash23.7M3.45M688%
Total Debt97.1M204K47,598%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WTHVF: Fundamental Ratings
WTHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WRLGFWTHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AATSX20.04N/A
N/A
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
DCUSX14.85N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI US S
ACFGX85.80N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr G
FSEKX14.45N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq A
CSJAX67.28N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares A

WRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLGF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLGF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLGF
1D Price
Change %
WRLGF100%
N/A
KNTNF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WDOFF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TORXF - WRLGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - WRLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - WRLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WTHVF and HSTXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WTHVF and HSTXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTHVF
1D Price
Change %
WTHVF100%
N/A
HSTXF - WTHVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEGCF - WTHVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - WTHVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVMF - WTHVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - WTHVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More