WLMIF
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.12 (+4.71%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
16.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WWNTY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
7.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

WLMIF vs WWNTY

Header iconWLMIF vs WWNTY Comparison
Open Charts WLMIF vs WWNTYBanner chart's image
Wilmar International
Price$2.67
Change+$0.12 (+4.71%)
Volume$2.14K
Capitalization16.11B
Want Want China Holdings
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization7.87B
WLMIF vs WWNTY Comparison Chart in %
WLMIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWNTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WLMIF vs. WWNTY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WLMIF is a Hold and WWNTY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (WLMIF: $2.67 vs. WWNTY: $31.79)
Brand notoriety: WLMIF and WWNTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WLMIF: 9% vs. WWNTY: 67%
Market capitalization -- WLMIF: $16.11B vs. WWNTY: $7.87B
WLMIF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $16.11B. WWNTY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $261.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWNTY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WWNTY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than WWNTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWNTY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WWNTY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both WLMIF and WWNTY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +8.98% price change this week, while WWNTY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.85% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($16.1B) has a higher market cap than WWNTY($7.87B). WLMIF has higher P/E ratio than WWNTY: WLMIF (14.13) vs WWNTY (12.32). WWNTY YTD gains are higher at: 25.123 vs. WLMIF (15.909). WWNTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.84B vs. WLMIF (4.45B). WLMIF has higher revenues than WWNTY: WLMIF (69.3B) vs WWNTY (23.5B).
WLMIFWWNTYWLMIF / WWNTY
Capitalization16.1B7.87B205%
EBITDA4.45B6.84B65%
Gain YTD15.90925.12363%
P/E Ratio14.1312.32115%
Revenue69.3B23.5B295%
Total Cash12.9BN/A-
Total Debt29.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WLMIF vs WWNTY: Fundamental Ratings
WLMIF
WWNTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
9819
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1566
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTY (33). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (100). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLMIF (98). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew significantly faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTY (59). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWNTY (66). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLMIFWWNTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLMIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWNTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLV72.550.16
+0.22%
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
SAA25.55-0.02
-0.07%
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
TAXM50.47-0.10
-0.20%
Bondbloxx Ir+M Tax-Aware ETF For Massachusetts Residents
PDI18.37-0.10
-0.54%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
COMT26.92-0.46
-1.68%
iShares GSCI Cmd Dyn Roll Stgy ETF

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
N/A
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
More

WWNTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WWNTY and USNA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WWNTY and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWNTY
1D Price
Change %
WWNTY100%
N/A
USNA - WWNTY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
ATPC - WWNTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
WLMIF - WWNTY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIY - WWNTY
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
PSYCF - WWNTY
11%
Poorly correlated
+20.79%
More