WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.51B
WWNTF
Price
$0.64
Change
+$0.01 (+1.59%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WLMIF vs WWNTF

Header iconWLMIF vs WWNTF Comparison
Open Charts WLMIF vs WWNTFBanner chart's image
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization19.51B
Want Want China Holdings
Price$0.64
Change+$0.01 (+1.59%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization8.27B
WLMIF vs WWNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WLMIF vs. WWNTF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WLMIF is a Hold and WWNTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (WLMIF: $2.35 vs. WWNTF: $0.64)
Brand notoriety: WLMIF and WWNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WLMIF: 3% vs. WWNTF: 84%
Market capitalization -- WLMIF: $19.51B vs. WWNTF: $8.27B
WLMIF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.51B. WWNTF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $8.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWNTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WWNTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWNTF is a better buy in the long-term than WLMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWNTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WWNTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WWNTF is a better buy in the short-term than WLMIF.

Price Growth

WLMIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +3.07% price change this week, while WWNTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than WWNTF($8.27B). WWNTF has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: WWNTF (16.08) vs WLMIF (8.61). WWNTF YTD gains are higher at: 11.348 vs. WLMIF (6.818). WWNTF (5.16B) and WLMIF (5.01B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . WWNTF has more cash in the bank: 8.66B vs. WLMIF (3.74B). WWNTF has less debt than WLMIF: WWNTF (6.29B) vs WLMIF (32.3B). WLMIF has higher revenues than WWNTF: WLMIF (72.4B) vs WWNTF (23.4B).
WLMIFWWNTFWLMIF / WWNTF
Capitalization19.5B8.27B236%
EBITDA5.01B5.16B97%
Gain YTD6.81811.34860%
P/E Ratio8.6116.0854%
Revenue72.4B23.4B309%
Total Cash3.74B8.66B43%
Total Debt32.3B6.29B514%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WLMIF vs WWNTF: Fundamental Ratings
WLMIF
WWNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8441
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9916
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1773
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTF (16). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (100). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLMIF (99). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (77). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWNTF (73). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLMIFWWNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMPS2.770.11
+4.14%
COMPASS Pathways Plc
OVBC30.180.39
+1.31%
Ohio Valley Banc Corp
TYL581.103.90
+0.68%
Tyler Technologies
PENN18.280.02
+0.11%
PENN Entertainment
POAI0.83-0.03
-3.50%
Predictive Oncology

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+8.10%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+17.84%
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

WWNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WWNTF and PSYCF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WWNTF and PSYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWNTF
1D Price
Change %
WWNTF100%
N/A
PSYCF - WWNTF
14%
Poorly correlated
-17.36%
WLMIY - WWNTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
LSF - WWNTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
WWNTY - WWNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - WWNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
More