WK
Price
$65.73
Change
-$1.07 (-1.60%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
46 days until earnings call
XYZ
Price
$61.57
Change
-$2.28 (-3.57%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
52.08B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

WK vs XYZ

Header iconWK vs XYZ Comparison
Open Charts WK vs XYZBanner chart's image
Workiva
Price$65.73
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
Volume$414.87K
Capitalization4.64B
Block
Price$61.57
Change-$2.28 (-3.57%)
Volume$7.04M
Capitalization52.08B
WK vs XYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WK vs. XYZ commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WK is a Buy and XYZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (WK: $65.73 vs. XYZ: $61.57)
Brand notoriety: WK: Not notable vs. XYZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WK: 68% vs. XYZ: 73%
Market capitalization -- WK: $4.64B vs. XYZ: $52.08B
WK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.64B. XYZ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $52.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXYZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XYZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XYZ is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WK’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XYZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XYZ is a better buy in the short-term than WK.

Price Growth

WK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.03% price change this week, while XYZ (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

WK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

XYZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.65% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XYZ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than WK($4.64B). XYZ YTD gains are higher at: -27.556 vs. WK (-39.973). XYZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. WK (-59.32M). XYZ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. WK (814M). WK has less debt than XYZ: WK (793M) vs XYZ (6.07B). XYZ has higher revenues than WK: XYZ (21.9B) vs WK (630M).
WKXYZWK / XYZ
Capitalization4.64B52.1B9%
EBITDA-59.32M790M-8%
Gain YTD-39.973-27.556145%
P/E RatioN/A4073.00-
Revenue630M21.9B3%
Total Cash814M9.02B9%
Total Debt793M6.07B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WK vs XYZ: Fundamental Ratings
WK
XYZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
10059
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5034

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XYZ's Valuation (90) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (98). This means that XYZ’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as XYZ (100). This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's SMR Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (100). This means that XYZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (86). This means that XYZ’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that XYZ’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WKXYZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UVV60.33-0.71
-1.16%
Universal Corp
UL62.67-0.98
-1.54%
Unilever plc
MAIA1.72-0.03
-1.71%
MAIA Biotechnology
BFAM123.18-2.30
-1.83%
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
HYLN1.45-0.06
-3.97%
Hyliion Holdings Corp

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
-1.60%
QTWO - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
FRSH - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.60%
BL - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
AGYS - WK
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
XYZ - WK
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
More

XYZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYZ has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XYZ jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYZ
1D Price
Change %
XYZ100%
-3.57%
AFRM - XYZ
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
DBX - XYZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
GDDY - XYZ
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
SHOP - XYZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
WK - XYZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
More