WHGRF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.01 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.94B
WLMIY
Price
$23.64
Change
+$0.38 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
18.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WHGRF vs WLMIY

Header iconWHGRF vs WLMIY Comparison
Open Charts WHGRF vs WLMIYBanner chart's image
WH Group
Price$0.95
Change-$0.01 (-1.04%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization6.94B
Wilmar International
Price$23.64
Change+$0.38 (+1.63%)
Volume$50.15K
Capitalization18.05B
WHGRF vs WLMIY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHGRF vs. WLMIY commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHGRF is a Hold and WLMIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (WHGRF: $0.95 vs. WLMIY: $23.64)
Brand notoriety: WHGRF and WLMIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHGRF: 368% vs. WLMIY: 115%
Market capitalization -- WHGRF: $6.94B vs. WLMIY: $18.05B
WHGRF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.94B. WLMIY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $18.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHGRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WHGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both WHGRF and WLMIY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHGRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHGRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLMIY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIY is a better buy in the short-term than WHGRF.

Price Growth

WHGRF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIY($18.1B) has a higher market cap than WHGRF($6.94B). WLMIY has higher P/E ratio than WHGRF: WLMIY (7.65) vs WHGRF (4.87). WHGRF YTD gains are higher at: 17.971 vs. WLMIY (11.672). WLMIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.16B vs. WHGRF (2.51B). WLMIY has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. WHGRF (1.79B). WHGRF has less debt than WLMIY: WHGRF (4.5B) vs WLMIY (30.7B). WLMIY has higher revenues than WHGRF: WLMIY (73.4B) vs WHGRF (27.3B).
WHGRFWLMIYWHGRF / WLMIY
Capitalization6.94B18.1B38%
EBITDA2.51B5.16B49%
Gain YTD17.97111.672154%
P/E Ratio4.877.6564%
Revenue27.3B73.4B37%
Total Cash1.79B2.44B73%
Total Debt4.5B30.7B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGRF vs WLMIY: Fundamental Ratings
WHGRF
WLMIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
6499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGRF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (13). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGRF (100). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew similarly to WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIY (99). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (51). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGRF (93). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHGRFWLMIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RXRX5.840.32
+5.80%
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
APG34.770.09
+0.26%
APi Group Corporation
SEPN12.55-0.07
-0.55%
Septerna Inc
SNTG1.93-0.02
-1.03%
Sentage Holdings
LARK26.25-0.40
-1.50%
Landmark Bancorp

WHGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGRF and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGRF and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGRF
1D Price
Change %
WHGRF100%
N/A
UVRBF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIY - WHGRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
TBLMF - WHGRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMEWF - WHGRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+8.00%
More

WLMIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIY and WWNTY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIY and WWNTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIY
1D Price
Change %
WLMIY100%
+1.63%
WWNTY - WLMIY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIY
11%
Poorly correlated
-9.15%
WLMIF - WLMIY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTF - WLMIY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - WLMIY
3%
Poorly correlated
-16.97%
More