WHGRF
Price
$1.07
Change
+$0.04 (+3.88%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
13.72B
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WHGRF vs WLMIF

Header iconWHGRF vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts WHGRF vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
WH Group
Price$1.07
Change+$0.04 (+3.88%)
Volume$351
Capitalization13.72B
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization14.39B
WHGRF vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHGRF vs. WLMIF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHGRF is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (WHGRF: $1.07 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: WHGRF and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHGRF: 1% vs. WLMIF: 91%
Market capitalization -- WHGRF: $13.72B vs. WLMIF: $14.39B
WHGRF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $13.72B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHGRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WHGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGRF is a better buy in the long-term than WLMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHGRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHGRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGRF.

Price Growth

WHGRF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.4B) and WHGRF($13.7B) have the same market capitalization . WLMIF has higher P/E ratio than WHGRF: WLMIF (11.93) vs WHGRF (8.51). WHGRF YTD gains are higher at: 32.873 vs. WLMIF (6.818).
WHGRFWLMIFWHGRF / WLMIF
Capitalization13.7B14.4B95%
EBITDAN/A4.45B-
Gain YTD32.8736.818482%
P/E Ratio8.5111.9371%
RevenueN/A69.3B-
Total CashN/A12.9B-
Total DebtN/A29.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGRF vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGRF
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
6699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGRF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (13). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (100). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (99). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (57). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHGRF (55). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHGRFWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATLCP23.620.08
+0.35%
Atlanticus Holdings Corp
CRL162.31-0.02
-0.01%
Charles River Laboratories International
IMAX29.21-0.02
-0.07%
Imax Corp
HOND11.50-0.01
-0.09%
HCM II Acquisition Corp.
BTAI3.57-0.05
-1.38%
BioXcel Therapeutics Inc

WHGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGRF and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGRF and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGRF
1D Price
Change %
WHGRF100%
N/A
UVRBF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIY - WHGRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
TBLMF - WHGRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMEWF - WHGRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
N/A
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More