Advertisement
WGMI vs WULF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WGMI is a Hold and WULF is a Hold.
WULF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| WGMI | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUITX | 24.57 | 0.13 | +0.53% |
| Buffalo Mid Cap Discovery Inst | |||
| PRJQX | 48.31 | 0.20 | +0.42% |
| PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R6 | |||
| WAMFX | 24.15 | 0.09 | +0.37% |
| Boston Trust Walden Midcap | |||
| ALTFX | 154.51 | 0.32 | +0.21% |
| AB Sustainable Global Thematic A | |||
| HLPPX | 10.11 | -0.03 | -0.30% |
| LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity P | |||
WGMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGMI has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WGMI jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WGMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WGMI | 100% | -2.03% | ||
| RIOT - WGMI | 91% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| MARA - WGMI | 91% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| CLSK - WGMI | 89% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BTBT - WGMI | 86% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| WULF - WGMI | 85% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||
WULF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | 100% | -2.82% | ||
| CIFR - WULF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HUT - WULF | 77% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| RIOT - WULF | 76% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| IREN - WULF | 76% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| BITF - WULF | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||