Advertisement
WFCF vs XROLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WFCF is a Hold and XROLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
XROLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WFCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XROLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- WFCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- XROLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
XROLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.03% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.51% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| WFCF | XROLF | WFCF / XROLF | |
| Capitalization | 57.7M | 12.5B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 3.7M | 168M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -16.163 | 6.781 | -238% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.64 | 1250.00 | 2% |
| Revenue | 25.1M | 1.31B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 2.64M | 1.05B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.8M | 1.07B | 0% |
WFCF | XROLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WFCF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as XROLF (83). This means that WFCF’s stock grew similarly to XROLF’s over the last 12 months.
XROLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as WFCF (65). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to WFCF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XROLF (78). This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XROLF’s over the last 12 months.
XROLF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as WFCF (60). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to WFCF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as XROLF (54). This means that WFCF’s stock grew similarly to XROLF’s over the last 12 months.
| WFCF | XROLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 25 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
WFCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WFCF and GUNGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFCF and GUNGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WFCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFCF | 100% | +1.37% | ||
| GUNGF - WFCF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PAYS - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CDTAF - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACCS - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| NTWK - WFCF | 20% Poorly correlated | +7.51% | ||
More | ||||
XROLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and CRYBF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and CRYBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XROLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XROLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRYBF - XROLF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.91% | ||
| NEOJF - XROLF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - XROLF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| WFCF - XROLF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| WTCHF - XROLF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||