WDOFF
Price
$7.98
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
WRLGF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

WDOFF vs WRLGF

Header iconWDOFF vs WRLGF Comparison
Open Charts WDOFF vs WRLGFBanner chart's image
Wesdome Gold Mines
Price$7.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$182.65K
CapitalizationN/A
WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES
Price$0.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$157.16K
CapitalizationN/A
WDOFF vs WRLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WDOFF vs. WRLGF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WDOFF is a Hold and WRLGF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (WDOFF: $7.98 vs. WRLGF: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: WDOFF and WRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WDOFF: 98% vs. WRLGF: 30%
Market capitalization -- WDOFF: $780.17M vs. WRLGF: $90.7M
WDOFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $780.17M. WRLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $90.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WDOFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • WDOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both WDOFF and WRLGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

WDOFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.26% price change this week, while WRLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDOFF($780M) has a higher market cap than WRLGF($90.7M). WDOFF YTD gains are higher at: 36.878 vs. WRLGF (-32.026). WDOFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 44.5M vs. WRLGF (-2.23M). WDOFF has more cash in the bank: 25.1M vs. WRLGF (4.36M). WDOFF has higher revenues than WRLGF: WDOFF (275M) vs WRLGF (0).
WDOFFWRLGFWDOFF / WRLGF
Capitalization780M90.7M860%
EBITDA44.5M-2.23M-1,998%
Gain YTD36.878-32.026-115%
P/E Ratio70.42N/A-
Revenue275M0-
Total Cash25.1M4.36M576%
Total Debt53.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDOFF: Fundamental Ratings
WDOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

WDOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDOFF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDOFF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDOFF
1D Price
Change %
WDOFF100%
N/A
TORXF - WDOFF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
LUGDF - WDOFF
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
KNTNF - WDOFF
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
AYASF - WDOFF
56%
Loosely correlated
-21.50%
DPMLF - WDOFF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More

WRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLGF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLGF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLGF
1D Price
Change %
WRLGF100%
+0.48%
KNTNF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
WDOFF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AYASF - WRLGF
33%
Loosely correlated
-21.50%
CXBMF - WRLGF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
TORXF - WRLGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
More