WDH
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
643.76M
ZFSVF
Price
$726.00
Change
+$28.60 (+4.10%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
99.16B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

WDH vs ZFSVF

Header iconWDH vs ZFSVF Comparison
Open Charts WDH vs ZFSVFBanner chart's image
Waterdrop
Price$1.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$226.16K
Capitalization643.76M
Zurich Insurance Group
Price$726.00
Change+$28.60 (+4.10%)
Volume$23
Capitalization99.16B
WDH vs ZFSVF Comparison Chart in %
WDH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZFSVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WDH vs. ZFSVF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WDH is a Hold and ZFSVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (WDH: $1.78 vs. ZFSVF: $726.00)
Brand notoriety: WDH and ZFSVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WDH: 50% vs. ZFSVF: 22%
Market capitalization -- WDH: $643.76M vs. ZFSVF: $99.16B
WDH [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $643.76M. ZFSVF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $99.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WDH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZFSVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • WDH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZFSVF is a better buy in the long-term than WDH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WDH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZFSVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WDH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZFSVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDH is a better buy in the short-term than ZFSVF.

Price Growth

WDH (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -3.26% price change this week, while ZFSVF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZFSVF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.54% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZFSVF($99.2B) has a higher market cap than WDH($644M). ZFSVF has higher P/E ratio than WDH: ZFSVF (17.85) vs WDH (10.57). WDH YTD gains are higher at: 55.746 vs. ZFSVF (22.807). ZFSVF has higher revenues than WDH: ZFSVF (71.4B) vs WDH (2.98B).
WDHZFSVFWDH / ZFSVF
Capitalization644M99.2B1%
EBITDA253MN/A-
Gain YTD55.74622.807244%
P/E Ratio10.5717.8559%
Revenue2.98B71.4B4%
Total CashN/A123B-
Total DebtN/A14.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZFSVF: Fundamental Ratings
ZFSVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WDHZFSVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WDH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZFSVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCVIX25.230.22
+0.88%
JHancock Classic Value I
RYFIX103.410.80
+0.78%
Rydex Financial Services Inv
HOOFX31.190.05
+0.16%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps F
SMBYX42.840.02
+0.05%
ClearBridge Mid Cap I
BROIX23.10N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage International Instl

WDH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDH and BNT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDH and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDH
1D Price
Change %
WDH100%
N/A
BNT - WDH
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
AEG - WDH
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
AIG - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
AGESY - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
EQH - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More

ZFSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZFSVF and ZURVY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZFSVF and ZURVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZFSVF
1D Price
Change %
ZFSVF100%
+4.10%
ZURVY - ZFSVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
AVVIY - ZFSVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
WDH - ZFSVF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEG - ZFSVF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
ORI - ZFSVF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More