WDH
Price
$1.79
Change
-$0.01 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
650.99M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZFSVF
Price
$740.83
Change
+$18.83 (+2.61%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
102.58B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

WDH vs ZFSVF

Header iconWDH vs ZFSVF Comparison
Open Charts WDH vs ZFSVFBanner chart's image
Waterdrop
Price$1.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.56%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization650.99M
Zurich Insurance Group
Price$740.83
Change+$18.83 (+2.61%)
Volume$190
Capitalization102.58B
WDH vs ZFSVF Comparison Chart in %
WDH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZFSVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WDH vs. ZFSVF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WDH is a Hold and ZFSVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (WDH: $1.80 vs. ZFSVF: $740.83)
Brand notoriety: WDH and ZFSVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WDH: 68% vs. ZFSVF: 42%
Market capitalization -- WDH: $650.99M vs. ZFSVF: $102.58B
WDH [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $650.99M. ZFSVF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $102.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $33.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WDH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZFSVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • WDH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZFSVF is a better buy in the long-term than WDH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WDH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZFSVF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WDH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZFSVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZFSVF is a better buy in the short-term than WDH.

Price Growth

WDH (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -3.74% price change this week, while ZFSVF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZFSVF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.91% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZFSVF($103B) has a higher market cap than WDH($651M). ZFSVF has higher P/E ratio than WDH: ZFSVF (18.22) vs WDH (8.97). ZFSVF YTD gains are higher at: -2.778 vs. WDH (-5.263). ZFSVF has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. WDH (1.45B). WDH has less debt than ZFSVF: WDH (85.1M) vs ZFSVF (14.5B). ZFSVF has higher revenues than WDH: ZFSVF (71.4B) vs WDH (3.25B).
WDHZFSVFWDH / ZFSVF
Capitalization651M103B1%
EBITDA340MN/A-
Gain YTD-5.263-2.778189%
P/E Ratio8.9718.2249%
Revenue3.25B71.4B5%
Total Cash1.45B123B1%
Total Debt85.1M14.5B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZFSVF: Fundamental Ratings
ZFSVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WDHZFSVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WDH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZFSVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNFI34.700.92
+2.72%
United Natural Foods
BAH96.351.04
+1.09%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp
CPBI17.10N/A
N/A
Central Plains Bancshares
ALDFU10.73N/A
N/A
Aldel Financial II Inc
SUPX14.45-0.14
-0.96%
SuperX AI Technology Limited

WDH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDH and AEG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDH and AEG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDH
1D Price
Change %
WDH100%
-1.10%
AEG - WDH
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
BNT - WDH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
AGESY - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
EQH - WDH
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
AIG - WDH
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More

ZFSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZFSVF and ZURVY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZFSVF and ZURVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZFSVF
1D Price
Change %
ZFSVF100%
N/A
ZURVY - ZFSVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
AVVIY - ZFSVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
WDH - ZFSVF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
AEG - ZFSVF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
ORI - ZFSVF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
More