Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$21.51
Change-$0.75 (-3.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.89M
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WTSGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a Hold and WTSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTSGX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMLX (41.9M). WCMLX (0.00) and WTSGX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WTSGX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WTSGX (46.00). WTSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WTSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WTSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.85 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.39 vs. WCMLX (4.74).
| WCMLX | WTSGX | WCMLX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.04 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.454 | 5.398 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 304M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.98 | -0.85 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.89 | 35.07 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.74 | 23.39 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers