Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.47M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$24.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.31M
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WTSGX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a Buy and WTSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTSGX has more cash in the bank: 327M vs. WCMLX (47.5M). WCMLX (0.00) and WTSGX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WTSGX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WTSGX (46.00). WTSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WTSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX (13.24) and WTSGX (12.93) have marching annual gain over last year. WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 10.45 vs. WCMLX (-2.44).
| WCMLX | WTSGX | WCMLX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.04 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.558 | 7.016 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.5M | 327M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | 12.93 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.48 | 45.27 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.44 | 10.45 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 173.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement