Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WRGCX
WCMLX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WRGCX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
Nomura Small Cap Growth C
Price$19.95
Change-$1.29 (-6.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
WCMLX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WRGCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a Hold and WRGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRGCX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). WCMLX (0.00) and WRGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WRGCX (76.00). WRGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WRGCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. WRGCX (1.84). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. WRGCX (-60.44).
| WCMLX | WRGCX | WCMLX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.88 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.04 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.395 | 3.048 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.1M | 1.08B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 1.84 | 464% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.51 | -4.32 | -452% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.30 | -60.44 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -39.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement