Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WRGCX
WCMLX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WRGCX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
Nomura Small Cap Growth C
Price$19.81
Change+$0.09 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
WCMLX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WRGCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a Hold and WRGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRGCX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. WCMLX (44.7M). WCMLX (0.00) and WRGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WRGCX (76.00). WRGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WRGCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. WRGCX (0.97). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. WRGCX (-57.38).
| WCMLX | WRGCX | WCMLX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.88 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.04 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 2.536 | 374% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.7M | 1.09B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 0.97 | 841% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.08 | 7.37 | 449% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.02 | -57.38 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -48.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement