Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBVNX vs WCMJX
WBVNX vs WCMJX Comparison
Open Charts WBVNX vs WCMJX
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$29.03
Change-$0.48 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.64M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
Price$10.69
Change-$0.13 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4M
WBVNX vs WCMJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBVNX vs. WCMJX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBVNX is a StrongBuy and WCMJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBVNX has more cash in the bank: 911M vs. WCMJX (7.41M). WBVNX pays higher dividends than WCMJX: WBVNX (0.60) vs WCMJX (0.00). WBVNX was incepted earlier than WCMJX: WBVNX (4 years) vs WCMJX (6 years). WCMJX (1.70) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). WBVNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. WCMJX (15.00). WCMJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVNX: WCMJX (1000) vs WBVNX (2500). WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.36 vs. WCMJX (-25.22). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 144.69 vs. WCMJX (13.30).
| WBVNX | WCMJX | WBVNX / WCMJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.70 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.539 | -8.149 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 911M | 7.41M | 12,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.36 | -25.22 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.08 | 4.14 | -123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.69 | 13.30 | 1,088% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement