Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
Price$28.47
Change-$0.22 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.09M
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. WCMLX (43.1M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WBSNX (75.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. WBSNX (-9.93). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. WBSNX (-10.56).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.726 | 7.232 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 43.1M | 2,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.93 | 1.70 | -586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.67 | 33.88 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.56 | 12.48 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement