Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
Price$29.66
Change+$0.45 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WBSNX (75.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. WBSNX (-14.21). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. WBSNX (-17.66).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.070 | 7.621 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 44.4M | 2,277% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.21 | -1.14 | 1,243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.24 | 21.83 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.66 | 1.99 | -888% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.21 | N/A | - |