WBRBY
Price
$6.64
Change
+$0.23 (+3.59%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XYIGF
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

WBRBY vs XYIGF

Header iconWBRBY vs XYIGF Comparison
Open Charts WBRBY vs XYIGFBanner chart's image
Wienerberger Baustoffindustrie AG
Price$6.64
Change+$0.23 (+3.59%)
Volume$1.49K
Capitalization3.78B
Xinyi Glass Holdings
Price$1.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization5.78B
WBRBY vs XYIGF Comparison Chart in %
WBRBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XYIGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WBRBY vs. XYIGF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBRBY is a Hold and XYIGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (WBRBY: $6.64 vs. XYIGF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: WBRBY and XYIGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WBRBY: 12% vs. XYIGF: 4%
Market capitalization -- WBRBY: $3.78B vs. XYIGF: $5.78B
WBRBY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $3.78B. XYIGF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $5.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $81.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WBRBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXYIGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • WBRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XYIGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, XYIGF is a better buy in the long-term than WBRBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WBRBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYIGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WBRBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XYIGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both WBRBY and XYIGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

WBRBY (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.39% price change this week, while XYIGF (@Construction Materials) price change was +19.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

WBRBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XYIGF($5.78B) has a higher market cap than WBRBY($3.78B). XYIGF has higher P/E ratio than WBRBY: XYIGF (21.77) vs WBRBY (15.14). XYIGF YTD gains are higher at: 31.068 vs. WBRBY (-7.651).
WBRBYXYIGFWBRBY / XYIGF
Capitalization3.78B5.78B65%
EBITDA750MN/A-
Gain YTD-7.65131.068-25%
P/E Ratio15.1421.7770%
Revenue4.65BN/A-
Total Cash232MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WBRBY vs XYIGF: Fundamental Ratings
WBRBY
XYIGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8446
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
8025
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
984
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBRBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as XYIGF (11). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to XYIGF’s over the last 12 months.

WBRBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as XYIGF (100). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to XYIGF’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WBRBY (80). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (51). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WBRBY (98). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew significantly faster than WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WBRBYXYIGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WBRBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XYIGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVUVX19.000.20
+1.06%
Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value Instl
MSSIX21.480.12
+0.56%
Victory Trivalent International Sm-Cp R6
ICRNX10.300.04
+0.39%
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate A
FSRBX36.02N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Banking
RFNCX94.29-1.14
-1.19%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R3

WBRBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBRBY and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBRBY and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBRBY
1D Price
Change %
WBRBY100%
-1.70%
HCMLY - WBRBY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
HDLMY - WBRBY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CXMSF - WBRBY
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
XYIGY - WBRBY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGF - WBRBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XYIGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XYIGF and XYIGY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XYIGF and XYIGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYIGF
1D Price
Change %
XYIGF100%
N/A
XYIGY - XYIGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCHNF - XYIGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSND - XYIGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - XYIGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
SDCVF - XYIGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More