Advertisement
WBBW vs WBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBBW is a Hold and WBS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
WBBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- WBBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WBBW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- WBBW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
WBBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
WBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.29% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| WBBW | WBS | WBBW / WBS | |
| Capitalization | 66.1M | 10.4B | 1% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.017 | 20.034 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.10 | 11.99 | 68% |
| Revenue | N/A | 2.81B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 425M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 3.81B | - |
WBBW | WBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WBBW's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as WBS (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WBBW (53) in the null industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to WBBW’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WBBW (56) in the null industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than WBBW’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WBBW (50) in the null industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to WBBW’s over the last 12 months.
WBBW's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as WBS (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
| WBBW | WBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TOUS | 34.67 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF | |||
| FSZ | 80.87 | 0.15 | +0.19% |
| First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| GJS | 23.42 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-2 Goldman Sachs Group | |||
| CTIF | 51.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Castellan Targeted Income ETF | |||
| XPH | 57.40 | -0.16 | -0.28% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® PhrmctlsETF | |||
WBBW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WBBW and FFWM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBBW and FFWM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBBW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBBW | 100% | N/A | ||
| FFWM - WBBW | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WBS - WBBW | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| PCLB - WBBW | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| VTYB - WBBW | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| VABK - WBBW | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
WBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBS | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| FNB - WBS | 93% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CFG - WBS | 92% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| WTFC - WBS | 92% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ASB - WBS | 91% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| EWBC - WBS | 90% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||