WARFF
Price
$2.76
Change
+$0.18 (+6.98%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
7.16B
WRFRF
Price
$2.85
Change
-$0.23 (-7.47%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
16.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WARFF vs WRFRF

Header iconWARFF vs WRFRF Comparison
Open Charts WARFF vs WRFRFBanner chart's image
Wharf Holdings
Price$2.76
Change+$0.18 (+6.98%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization7.16B
Wharf Real Estate Investment
Price$2.85
Change-$0.23 (-7.47%)
Volume$6.56K
Capitalization16.26B
WARFF vs WRFRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WARFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WARFF vs. WRFRF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WARFF is a Hold and WRFRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (WARFF: $2.76 vs. WRFRF: $2.85)
Brand notoriety: WARFF and WRFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WARFF: 225% vs. WRFRF: 268%
Market capitalization -- WARFF: $7.16B vs. WRFRF: $16.26B
WARFF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $7.16B. WRFRF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $16.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WARFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRFRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WARFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRFRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WRFRF is a better buy in the long-term than WARFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WARFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRFRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WARFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WRFRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WARFF is a better buy in the short-term than WRFRF.

Price Growth

WARFF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WRFRF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -7.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.43% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRFRF($16.3B) has a higher market cap than WARFF($7.16B). WRFRF has higher P/E ratio than WARFF: WRFRF (25.91) vs WARFF (10.99). WRFRF YTD gains are higher at: 21.842 vs. WARFF (0.364). WARFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3B vs. WRFRF (2.47B). WARFF has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. WRFRF (2.2B). WARFF has less debt than WRFRF: WARFF (36.7B) vs WRFRF (49B). WARFF has higher revenues than WRFRF: WARFF (22.4B) vs WRFRF (14.8B).
WARFFWRFRFWARFF / WRFRF
Capitalization7.16B16.3B44%
EBITDA10.3B2.47B417%
Gain YTD0.36421.8422%
P/E Ratio10.9925.9142%
Revenue22.4B14.8B151%
Total Cash23.6B2.2B1,074%
Total Debt36.7B49B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WARFF vs WRFRF: Fundamental Ratings
WARFF
WRFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
8690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
702
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRFRF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as WARFF (38). This means that WRFRF’s stock grew similarly to WARFF’s over the last 12 months.

WARFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRFRF (100). This means that WARFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRFRF’s over the last 12 months.

WARFF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as WRFRF (90). This means that WARFF’s stock grew similarly to WRFRF’s over the last 12 months.

WRFRF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WARFF (49). This means that WRFRF’s stock grew similarly to WARFF’s over the last 12 months.

WRFRF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WARFF (70). This means that WRFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than WARFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WARFFWRFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WARFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVUS102.530.69
+0.68%
Avantis US Equity ETF
SOXY52.440.29
+0.55%
YieldMax Target 12 Smcndctr Opt Inc ETF
BGX12.470.03
+0.24%
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
AVSF46.78-0.06
-0.14%
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
EWK22.07-0.09
-0.41%
iShares MSCI Belgium ETF

WARFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WARFF and UCASU have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WARFF and UCASU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WARFF
1D Price
Change %
WARFF100%
N/A
UCASU - WARFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNPPF - WARFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRFRF - WARFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VNNVF - WARFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOLGY - WARFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More

WRFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRFRF has been loosely correlated with CDEVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRFRF jumps, then CDEVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRFRF
1D Price
Change %
WRFRF100%
N/A
CDEVF - WRFRF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HYSNF - WRFRF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHVKF - WRFRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRPTF - WRFRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGPBF - WRFRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More