VYM | WBIF | VYM / WBIF | |
Gain YTD | 10.338 | 9.243 | 112% |
Net Assets | 79.5B | 30.2M | 263,245% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 1.52 | 4% |
Turnover | 13.00 | 742.00 | 2% |
Yield | 2.54 | 0.31 | 822% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
VYM | WBIF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago81% | 4 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 11 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VYM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VYM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that WBIF and CVS have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBIF and CVS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF | 100% | +1.37% | ||
CVS - WBIF | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
FCFS - WBIF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
ELV - WBIF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
MSFT - WBIF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
G - WBIF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More |