Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VRTIX vs WHGCX
VRTIX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts VRTIX vs WHGCX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I
Price$390.71
Change+$1.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.25B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$19.12
Change-$0.06 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.32M
VRTIX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VRTIX vs. WHGCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VRTIX is a Buy and WHGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTIX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. WHGCX (942M). VRTIX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: VRTIX (1.17) vs WHGCX (0.26). VRTIX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: VRTIX (15 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than VRTIX (0.07). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. VRTIX (14.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTIX: WHGCX (1000) vs VRTIX (5000000). VRTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. WHGCX (-4.62). VRTIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. WHGCX (11.07).
| VRTIX | WHGCX | VRTIX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.79 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.503 | -3.968 | -366% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.3B | 942M | 1,518% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.26 | 456% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | -4.62 | -283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.54 | 6.34 | 734% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | 11.07 | 264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement