VRRCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.93M
WMLLF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

VRRCF vs WMLLF

Header iconVRRCF vs WMLLF Comparison
Open Charts VRRCF vs WMLLFBanner chart's image
VR Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45K
Capitalization1.93M
Wealth Minerals
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization16.06M
VRRCF vs WMLLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VRRCF vs. WMLLF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VRRCF is a Hold and WMLLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (VRRCF: $0.02 vs. WMLLF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: VRRCF and WMLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VRRCF: 31% vs. WMLLF: 980%
Market capitalization -- VRRCF: $1.93M vs. WMLLF: $16.06M
VRRCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.93M. WMLLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VRRCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMLLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VRRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both VRRCF and WMLLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VRRCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMLLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VRRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WMLLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WMLLF is a better buy in the short-term than VRRCF.

Price Growth

VRRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.26% price change this week, while WMLLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +50.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMLLF($16.1M) has a higher market cap than VRRCF($1.93M). WMLLF YTD gains are higher at: 46.286 vs. VRRCF (-54.902). VRRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -830.23K vs. WMLLF (-3.82M). WMLLF has more cash in the bank: 929K vs. VRRCF (255K). VRRCF (0) and WMLLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VRRCFWMLLFVRRCF / WMLLF
Capitalization1.93M16.1M12%
EBITDA-830.23K-3.82M22%
Gain YTD-54.90246.286-119%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash255K929K27%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRRCF vs WMLLF: Fundamental Ratings
VRRCF
WMLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRRCF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as WMLLF (57). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew similarly to WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

VRRCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WMLLF (100). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew similarly to WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

VRRCF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WMLLF (99). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew similarly to WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

WMLLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (62). This means that WMLLF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

WMLLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (100). This means that WMLLF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VRRCFWMLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MATV12.430.38
+3.15%
Mativ Holdings
AGYS110.562.31
+2.13%
Agilysys
XTLB1.25N/A
N/A
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd
CG63.75-1.18
-1.82%
Carlyle Group (The)
PNBK1.44-0.03
-2.04%
Patriot National Bancorp

VRRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRRCF and SVMLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRRCF and SVMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRRCF
1D Price
Change %
VRRCF100%
-0.54%
SVMLF - VRRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
UURAF - VRRCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+8.48%
VZLA - VRRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
WMLLF - VRRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+37.86%
TSKFF - VRRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
More

WMLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WMLLF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WMLLF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMLLF
1D Price
Change %
WMLLF100%
+37.86%
ABRMF - WMLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VULMF - WMLLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRRCF - WMLLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
ELECF - WMLLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
BRIOF - WMLLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More