VLMZF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.3M
WFRSF
Price
$1.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

VLMZF vs WFRSF

Header iconVLMZF vs WFRSF Comparison
Open Charts VLMZF vs WFRSFBanner chart's image
Volcanic Gold Mines
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.5K
Capitalization7.3M
West African Resources
Price$1.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.28B
VLMZF vs WFRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VLMZF vs. WFRSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VLMZF is a Hold and WFRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (VLMZF: $0.13 vs. WFRSF: $1.20)
Brand notoriety: VLMZF and WFRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VLMZF: 115% vs. WFRSF: 1%
Market capitalization -- VLMZF: $7.3M vs. WFRSF: $2.28B
VLMZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.3M. WFRSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VLMZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VLMZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WFRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFRSF is a better buy in the long-term than VLMZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VLMZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VLMZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLMZF is a better buy in the short-term than WFRSF.

Price Growth

VLMZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +117.33% price change this week, while WFRSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRSF($2.29B) has a higher market cap than VLMZF($7.3M). VLMZF YTD gains are higher at: 117.333 vs. WFRSF (31.868). WFRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 579M vs. VLMZF (-907.53K). WFRSF has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. VLMZF (578K). VLMZF has less debt than WFRSF: VLMZF (89.6K) vs WFRSF (426M). WFRSF has higher revenues than VLMZF: WFRSF (856M) vs VLMZF (0).
VLMZFWFRSFVLMZF / WFRSF
Capitalization7.3M2.29B0%
EBITDA-907.53K579M-0%
Gain YTD117.33331.868368%
P/E RatioN/A6.29-
Revenue0856M-
Total Cash578K392M0%
Total Debt89.6K426M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VLMZF vs WFRSF: Fundamental Ratings
VLMZF
WFRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9966
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
9834
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFRSF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (64). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLMZF (100). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLMZF (98). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WFRSF (65). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to WFRSF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (100). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VLMZFWFRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MG9.58-0.09
-0.93%
Mistras Group
RAND14.71-0.15
-1.03%
Rand Capital Corp
HSBC68.93-0.96
-1.37%
HSBC Holdings PLC
NVTS6.51-0.35
-5.10%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp
KMX45.60-11.45
-20.07%
CarMax

VLMZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMZF and WFRSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMZF and WFRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMZF
1D Price
Change %
VLMZF100%
N/A
WFRSF - VLMZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGGTF - VLMZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-20.25%
VGMIF - VLMZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - VLMZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGDF - VLMZF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+8.24%
More

WFRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFRSF and SKHRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFRSF and SKHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRSF
1D Price
Change %
WFRSF100%
N/A
SKHRF - WFRSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - WFRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEM - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
EOGSF - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.15%
BTG - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More