VLKPF
Price
$105.25
Change
-$5.34 (-4.83%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
53.92B
YAMHF
Price
$7.70
Change
+$0.69 (+9.84%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

VLKPF vs YAMHF

Header iconVLKPF vs YAMHF Comparison
Open Charts VLKPF vs YAMHFBanner chart's image
Volkswagen AG
Price$105.25
Change-$5.34 (-4.83%)
Volume$12
Capitalization53.92B
Yamaha Motor
Price$7.70
Change+$0.69 (+9.84%)
Volume$753
Capitalization7.26B
VLKPF vs YAMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VLKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VLKPF vs. YAMHF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VLKPF is a Hold and YAMHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (VLKPF: $105.25 vs. YAMHF: $7.70)
Brand notoriety: VLKPF and YAMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VLKPF: 5% vs. YAMHF: 96%
Market capitalization -- VLKPF: $53.92B vs. YAMHF: $7.26B
VLKPF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $53.92B. YAMHF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $7.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VLKPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYAMHF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • VLKPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YAMHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, YAMHF is a better buy in the long-term than VLKPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VLKPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YAMHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VLKPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YAMHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YAMHF is a better buy in the short-term than VLKPF.

Price Growth

VLKPF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -5.18% price change this week, while YAMHF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +3.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-2.21% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLKPF($53.9B) has a higher market cap than YAMHF($7.26B). YAMHF has higher P/E ratio than VLKPF: YAMHF (22.88) vs VLKPF (5.35). VLKPF YTD gains are higher at: 12.848 vs. YAMHF (-7.784). YAMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 209B vs. VLKPF (49.8B). YAMHF has more cash in the bank: 410B vs. VLKPF (62.9B). VLKPF has less debt than YAMHF: VLKPF (188B) vs YAMHF (957B). YAMHF has higher revenues than VLKPF: YAMHF (2.51T) vs VLKPF (324B).
VLKPFYAMHFVLKPF / YAMHF
Capitalization53.9B7.26B743%
EBITDA49.8B209B24%
Gain YTD12.848-7.784-165%
P/E Ratio5.3522.8823%
Revenue324B2.51T13%
Total Cash62.9B410B15%
Total Debt188B957B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VLKPF vs YAMHF: Fundamental Ratings
VLKPF
YAMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
8618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLKPF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMHF (14). This means that VLKPF’s stock grew similarly to YAMHF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLKPF (100). This means that YAMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLKPF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMHF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLKPF (86). This means that YAMHF’s stock grew significantly faster than VLKPF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMHF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as VLKPF (61). This means that YAMHF’s stock grew similarly to VLKPF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMHF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as VLKPF (11). This means that YAMHF’s stock grew similarly to VLKPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VLKPFYAMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VLKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGDM60.771.25
+2.10%
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
BJK45.580.64
+1.42%
VanEck Gaming ETF
TPIF33.120.21
+0.65%
Timothy Plan International ETF
IOO118.940.62
+0.52%
iShares Global 100 ETF
IBHL25.780.04
+0.16%
iShares iBonds 2032 Term HY and Inc ETF

VLKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLKPF has been loosely correlated with DRPRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLKPF jumps, then DRPRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLKPF
1D Price
Change %
VLKPF100%
N/A
DRPRY - VLKPF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
MBGAF - VLKPF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
POAHF - VLKPF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
MBGYY - VLKPF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
BAMXF - VLKPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YAMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YAMHF and VLKPF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YAMHF and VLKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YAMHF
1D Price
Change %
YAMHF100%
+9.76%
VLKPF - YAMHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMHAY - YAMHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
VWAPY - YAMHF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
ARGGY - YAMHF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
BYMOF - YAMHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More