VLCJF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
26.47M
VLMZF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

VLCJF vs VLMZF

Header iconVLCJF vs VLMZF Comparison
Open Charts VLCJF vs VLMZFBanner chart's image
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization26.47M
Volcanic Gold Mines
Price$0.12
Change+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Volume$8.5K
Capitalization6.61M
VLCJF vs VLMZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VLCJF vs. VLMZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VLCJF is a Hold and VLMZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (VLCJF: $0.13 vs. VLMZF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: VLCJF and VLMZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VLCJF: 10% vs. VLMZF: 35%
Market capitalization -- VLCJF: $26.47M vs. VLMZF: $6.61M
VLCJF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $26.47M. VLMZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VLCJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLMZF is a better buy in the long-term than VLCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VLCJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VLCJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLMZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLMZF is a better buy in the short-term than VLCJF.

Price Growth

VLCJF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.27% price change this week, while VLMZF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLCJF($26.5M) has a higher market cap than VLMZF($6.61M). VLMZF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. VLCJF (24.293). VLCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.3M vs. VLMZF (-1.91M). VLCJF has more cash in the bank: 1.42M vs. VLMZF (516K). VLCJF has less debt than VLMZF: VLCJF (46.5K) vs VLMZF (93.6K). VLCJF (0) and VLMZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VLCJFVLMZFVLCJF / VLMZF
Capitalization26.5M6.61M401%
EBITDA-1.3M-1.91M68%
Gain YTD24.293100.00024%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.42M516K274%
Total Debt46.5K93.6K50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VLCJF vs VLMZF: Fundamental Ratings
VLCJF
VLMZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9943
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5135
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (59). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (99). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (51). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VLCJFVLMZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFIN10.790.36
+3.45%
Medallion Financial Corp
TKR77.422.30
+3.06%
Timken Company (The)
HLIT9.920.15
+1.54%
Harmonic
EDRY10.90N/A
N/A
EuroDry Ltd
BP34.30-0.16
-0.46%
BP plc

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and VGMIF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and VGMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VITFF - VLCJF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - VLCJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VAUCF - VLCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.34%
USGDF - VLCJF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%

VLMZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMZF and WFRSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMZF and WFRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMZF
1D Price
Change %
VLMZF100%
N/A
WFRSF - VLMZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGGTF - VLMZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.34%
VGMIF - VLMZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - VLMZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VITFF - VLMZF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More