Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VIVAX vs WHGLX
VIVAX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts VIVAX vs WHGLX
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$73.17
Change-$0.74 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.95B
Westwood Quality Value Fund Inst
Price$14.03
Change-$0.11 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.92M
VIVAX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VIVAX vs. WHGLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIVAX is a Buy and WHGLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. WHGLX (183M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than WHGLX: VIVAX (1.98) vs WHGLX (1.30). VIVAX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: VIVAX (33 years) vs WHGLX (19 years). WHGLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). VIVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: VIVAX (3000) vs WHGLX (100000). VIVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. WHGLX (-5.59). VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.34 vs. WHGLX (15.52).
| VIVAX | WHGLX | VIVAX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.62 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.69 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.965 | 4.896 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208B | 183M | 113,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 1.30 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | -5.59 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.49 | 13.78 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.34 | 15.52 | 427% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.00 | 38.86 | 347% |