Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VIGRX vs WSACX
VIGRX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts VIGRX vs WSACX
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$239.65
Change+$1.47 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.49B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$30.11
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.32M
VIGRX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VIGRX vs. WSACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIGRX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WSACX (63.3M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than WSACX: VIGRX (0.32) vs WSACX (0.06). VIGRX was incepted earlier than WSACX: VIGRX (33 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. VIGRX (11.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: VIGRX (3000) vs WSACX (5000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.21 vs. WSACX (14.37). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 100.96 vs. WSACX (24.81).
| VIGRX | WSACX | VIGRX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.34 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.34 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.727 | 7.958 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 5000 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 63.3M | 518,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.06 | 517% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.21 | 14.37 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.74 | 22.89 | 423% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.96 | 24.81 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 347.40 | 32.79 | 1,059% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement