Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VIGRX vs WSACX
VIGRX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts VIGRX vs WSACX
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$234.74
Change+$0.93 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.95B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$30.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.24M
VIGRX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VIGRX vs. WSACX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIGRX is a Buy and WSACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. WSACX (63.2M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than WSACX: VIGRX (0.34) vs WSACX (0.06). VIGRX was incepted earlier than WSACX: VIGRX (33 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. VIGRX (11.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: VIGRX (3000) vs WSACX (5000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.04 vs. WSACX (12.21). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.28 vs. WSACX (27.75).
| VIGRX | WSACX | VIGRX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.34 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.34 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.098 | 8.138 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 5000 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 63.2M | 493,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.06 | 529% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.04 | 12.21 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.95 | 19.94 | 406% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.28 | 27.75 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 314.35 | 26.90 | 1,169% |