VHT | XHS | VHT / XHS | |
Gain YTD | -0.045 | 12.338 | -0% |
Net Assets | 17.6B | 74.6M | 23,592% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.35 | 26% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 37.00 | 11% |
Yield | 1.56 | 0.28 | 556% |
Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
VHT | XHS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 3 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 11 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VHT has been closely correlated with TMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VHT jumps, then TMO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XHS and UNH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XHS and UNH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XHS | 100% | +1.71% | ||
UNH - XHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
MD - XHS | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
SEM - XHS | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
RDNT - XHS | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
LFST - XHS | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.14% | ||
More |