VHT | XHS | VHT / XHS | |
Gain YTD | -0.296 | 5.592 | -5% |
Net Assets | 17B | 76.6M | 22,193% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.35 | 26% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 37.00 | 11% |
Yield | 1.65 | 0.31 | 531% |
Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
VHT | XHS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 5 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago84% | 11 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VHT has been closely correlated with TMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VHT jumps, then TMO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XHS and UNH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XHS and UNH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XHS | 100% | N/A | ||
UNH - XHS | 31% Poorly correlated | +11.98% | ||
AMED - XHS | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RDNT - XHS | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
MD - XHS | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
BKD - XHS | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
More |