VGMIF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLMZF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
5.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VGMIF vs VLMZF

Header iconVGMIF vs VLMZF Comparison
Open Charts VGMIF vs VLMZFBanner chart's image
Visible Gold Mines
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$70K
Capitalization2.92M
Volcanic Gold Mines
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization5.3M
VGMIF vs VLMZF Comparison Chart in %
VGMIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLMZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VGMIF vs. VLMZF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VGMIF is a Buy and VLMZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (VGMIF: $0.09 vs. VLMZF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: VGMIF and VLMZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VGMIF: 153% vs. VLMZF: 52%
Market capitalization -- VGMIF: $2.92M vs. VLMZF: $5.3M
VGMIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.92M. VLMZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VGMIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • VGMIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both VGMIF and VLMZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VGMIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VGMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • VLMZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VGMIF is a better buy in the short-term than VLMZF.

Price Growth

VGMIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VLMZF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6505.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLMZF($5.3M) has a higher market cap than VGMIF($2.92M). VGMIF YTD gains are higher at: 9.756 vs. VLMZF (-75.000). VGMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -838.57K vs. VLMZF (-907.53K). VLMZF has more cash in the bank: 578K vs. VGMIF (22.9K). VGMIF has less debt than VLMZF: VGMIF (62.2K) vs VLMZF (89.6K). VGMIF (0) and VLMZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VGMIFVLMZFVGMIF / VLMZF
Capitalization2.92M5.3M55%
EBITDA-838.57K-907.53K92%
Gain YTD9.756-75.000-13%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash22.9K578K4%
Total Debt62.2K89.6K69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VGMIF vs VLMZF: Fundamental Ratings
VGMIF
VLMZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3498
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLMZF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VGMIF (69). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VGMIF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLMZF (98). This means that VGMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

VGMIF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMZF (100). This means that VGMIF’s stock grew similarly to VLMZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VGMIFVLMZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VGMIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLMZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HUBB453.002.88
+0.64%
Hubbell
FBP20.420.09
+0.44%
First BanCorp
IIIV29.330.04
+0.14%
i3 Verticals
ZDAI0.40-0.01
-2.98%
DirectBooking Technology Co. Ltd.
SLSN1.94-0.19
-8.92%
Solesence Inc

VGMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGMIF has been loosely correlated with SRCRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VGMIF jumps, then SRCRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGMIF
1D Price
Change %
VGMIF100%
N/A
SRCRF - VGMIF
38%
Loosely correlated
+18.73%
AEM - VGMIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
CGAU - VGMIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
KGC - VGMIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
HMY - VGMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
More

VLMZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMZF and AISSF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMZF and AISSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMZF
1D Price
Change %
VLMZF100%
N/A
AISSF - VLMZF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFRSF - VLMZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+12.93%
SGGTF - VLMZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - VLMZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - VLMZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More