VGMIF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.03 (-60.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.6M
VLCJF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
13.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

VGMIF vs VLCJF

Header iconVGMIF vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts VGMIF vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
Visible Gold Mines
Price$0.02
Change-$0.03 (-60.00%)
Volume$102
Capitalization2.6M
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$15.5K
Capitalization13.79M
VGMIF vs VLCJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VGMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VGMIF vs. VLCJF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VGMIF is a Hold and VLCJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (VGMIF: $0.02 vs. VLCJF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: VGMIF and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VGMIF: 3% vs. VLCJF: 183%
Market capitalization -- VGMIF: $2.6M vs. VLCJF: $13.79M
VGMIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.6M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VGMIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VGMIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLCJF is a better buy in the long-term than VGMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VGMIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLCJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VGMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLCJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VGMIF is a better buy in the short-term than VLCJF.

Price Growth

VGMIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLCJF($13.8M) has a higher market cap than VGMIF($2.6M). VLCJF YTD gains are higher at: 32.339 vs. VGMIF (-80.366). VGMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -337.68K vs. VLCJF (-2.47M). VLCJF has more cash in the bank: 1.85M vs. VGMIF (52.6K). VGMIF (0) and VLCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VGMIFVLCJFVGMIF / VLCJF
Capitalization2.6M13.8M19%
EBITDA-337.68K-2.47M14%
Gain YTD-80.36632.339-249%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash52.6K1.85M3%
Total DebtN/A237K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VGMIF vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
VGMIF
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (69). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VGMIF (97). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VGMIFVLCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VGMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WETH0.990.07
+7.61%
Wetouch Technology
EW78.211.06
+1.37%
Edwards Lifesciences Corp
FROG43.900.52
+1.21%
JFrog Ltd
OZ65.070.02
+0.03%
Belpointe PREP LLC
WVE6.67-0.36
-5.12%
Wave Life Sciences Ltd

VGMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VGMIF and PNTRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VGMIF and PNTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGMIF
1D Price
Change %
VGMIF100%
N/A
PNTRF - VGMIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.70%
PNGZF - VGMIF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRDOF - VGMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
MXROF - VGMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+20.19%
VAUCF - VGMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
-13.23%
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and ZMPLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and ZMPLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
ZMPLF - VLCJF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VITFF - VLCJF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSVRF - VLCJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.68%
VLMZF - VLCJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More