VDOMF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.39M
WLBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

VDOMF vs WLBMF

Header iconVDOMF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts VDOMF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Val D Or Mng
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$80K
Capitalization4.39M
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$58.55K
Capitalization60.17M
VDOMF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VDOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VDOMF vs. WLBMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VDOMF is a Hold and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (VDOMF: $0.05 vs. WLBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: VDOMF and WLBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VDOMF: 443% vs. WLBMF: 25%
Market capitalization -- VDOMF: $4.39M vs. WLBMF: $60.17M
VDOMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.39M. WLBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $60.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VDOMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VDOMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VDOMF is a better buy in the long-term than WLBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VDOMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VDOMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VDOMF is a better buy in the short-term than WLBMF.

Price Growth

VDOMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLBMF($60.2M) has a higher market cap than VDOMF($4.39M). WLBMF YTD gains are higher at: 16.223 vs. VDOMF (10.667). VDOMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 736K vs. WLBMF (-7.36M). WLBMF has more cash in the bank: 29.8M vs. VDOMF (1.41M). WLBMF has less debt than VDOMF: WLBMF (26.3K) vs VDOMF (60K). VDOMF has higher revenues than WLBMF: VDOMF (233K) vs WLBMF (0).
VDOMFWLBMFVDOMF / WLBMF
Capitalization4.39M60.2M7%
EBITDA736K-7.36M-10%
Gain YTD10.66716.22366%
P/E Ratio11.59N/A-
Revenue233K0-
Total Cash1.41M29.8M5%
Total Debt60K26.3K228%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VDOMF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
VDOMF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLBMF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as VDOMF (79). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to VDOMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VDOMF (100). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to VDOMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as VDOMF (93). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to VDOMF’s over the last 12 months.

VDOMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (48). This means that VDOMF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

VDOMF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that VDOMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VDOMFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VDOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SENS0.500.01
+2.55%
Senseonics Holdings
PDFS22.990.39
+1.73%
PDF Solutions
ARTV1.610.02
+1.26%
Artiva Biotherapeutics Inc
ETN362.224.03
+1.13%
Eaton Corp
DTM105.940.17
+0.16%
DT Midstream

VDOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VDOMF and MMILF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VDOMF and MMILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VDOMF
1D Price
Change %
VDOMF100%
N/A
MMILF - VDOMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTCPF - VDOMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
PPZRF - VDOMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRF - VDOMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLBMF - VDOMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and LUNMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and LUNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
+3.00%
LUNMF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
AZMCF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
FGOVF - WLBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
IVPAF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
AAGFF - WLBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More