VAUCF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
17.52M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLCJF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
25.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VAUCF vs VLCJF

Header iconVAUCF vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts VAUCF vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
Viva Gold
Price$0.14
Change+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Volume$195.79K
Capitalization17.52M
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization25.94M
VAUCF vs VLCJF Comparison Chart in %
VAUCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLCJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VAUCF vs. VLCJF commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VAUCF is a StrongBuy and VLCJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (VAUCF: $0.14 vs. VLCJF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: VAUCF and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VAUCF: 99% vs. VLCJF: 143%
Market capitalization -- VAUCF: $17.52M vs. VLCJF: $25.94M
VAUCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $17.52M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VAUCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VAUCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VAUCF is a better buy in the long-term than VLCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VAUCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLCJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VAUCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLCJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VAUCF is a better buy in the short-term than VLCJF.

Price Growth

VAUCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.81% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLCJF($25.9M) has a higher market cap than VAUCF($17.5M). VAUCF YTD gains are higher at: 39.920 vs. VLCJF (15.496). VLCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. VAUCF (-2.83M). VLCJF has more cash in the bank: 2.88M vs. VAUCF (991K). VAUCF (0) and VLCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VAUCFVLCJFVAUCF / VLCJF
Capitalization17.5M25.9M68%
EBITDA-2.83M-1.69M168%
Gain YTD39.92015.496258%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash991K2.88M34%
Total DebtN/A15.1K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VAUCF vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
VAUCF
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as VAUCF (68). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VAUCF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as VAUCF (99). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

VAUCF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (63). This means that VAUCF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

VAUCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (100). This means that VAUCF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VAUCFVLCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VAUCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLCJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROAD113.071.06
+0.95%
Construction Partners
ACN271.091.11
+0.41%
Accenture PLC
PRE16.88-0.03
-0.18%
Prenetics Global Limited
CTOS5.97-0.02
-0.33%
Custom Truck One Source
BRLS1.62-0.06
-3.57%
Borealis Foods

VAUCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VAUCF and CRDOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VAUCF and CRDOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VAUCF
1D Price
Change %
VAUCF100%
+14.34%
CRDOF - VAUCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.66%
CBGZF - VAUCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
DRD - VAUCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
CDE - VAUCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
HWAUF - VAUCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+23.60%
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and EGMCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and EGMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
EGMCF - VLCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
+21.43%
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - VLCJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VAUCF - VLCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+14.34%
BSXGF - VLCJF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%