USGDF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
41.93M
VLMGF
Price
$0.57
Change
+$0.03 (+5.56%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

USGDF vs VLMGF

Header iconUSGDF vs VLMGF Comparison
Open Charts USGDF vs VLMGFBanner chart's image
American Pacific Mining
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$128.5K
Capitalization41.93M
Viscount Mining
Price$0.57
Change+$0.03 (+5.56%)
Volume$16.38K
Capitalization13M
USGDF vs VLMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
USGDF vs. VLMGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is USGDF is a Hold and VLMGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (USGDF: $0.17 vs. VLMGF: $0.57)
Brand notoriety: USGDF and VLMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: USGDF: 55% vs. VLMGF: 56%
Market capitalization -- USGDF: $41.93M vs. VLMGF: $13M
USGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.93M. VLMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

USGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • USGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLMGF is a better buy in the long-term than USGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

USGDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • USGDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VLMGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLMGF is a better buy in the short-term than USGDF.

Price Growth

USGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while VLMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USGDF($41.9M) has a higher market cap than VLMGF($13M). VLMGF YTD gains are higher at: 259.480 vs. USGDF (19.286). VLMGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65M vs. USGDF (-8.82M). USGDF has more cash in the bank: 4.06M vs. VLMGF (483K). VLMGF has less debt than USGDF: VLMGF (12.7K) vs USGDF (117K). USGDF (0) and VLMGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
USGDFVLMGFUSGDF / VLMGF
Capitalization41.9M13M322%
EBITDA-8.82M-1.65M534%
Gain YTD19.286259.4807%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.06M483K841%
Total Debt117K12.7K921%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
USGDF vs VLMGF: Fundamental Ratings
USGDF
VLMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
8493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLMGF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (67). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USGDF (100). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMGF (93). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (43). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLMGF (100). This means that USGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
USGDFVLMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXPGF52.000.98
+1.92%
Experian plc
SHMY3.00N/A
N/A
SYNERGY EMPIRE LTD.
CZBC9.91N/A
N/A
Citizens Bancorp
IRCUF6.24N/A
N/A
Irish Continental Group Plc
NPTVF21.76N/A
N/A
Nippon Television Network Corporation

USGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USGDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USGDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USGDF
1D Price
Change %
USGDF100%
-1.76%
NSUPF - USGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
ISVLF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
BCEKF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
EQMEF - USGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
BVN - USGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
More

VLMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMGF and TAJIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMGF and TAJIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMGF
1D Price
Change %
VLMGF100%
+4.98%
TAJIF - VLMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVGLF - VLMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
VLMZF - VLMGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGDF - VLMGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
VGMIF - VLMGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More