USGDF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
39.08M
VLCJF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
25.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

USGDF vs VLCJF

Header iconUSGDF vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts USGDF vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
American Pacific Mining
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$227.9K
Capitalization39.08M
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization25.13M
USGDF vs VLCJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
USGDF vs. VLCJF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is USGDF is a Hold and VLCJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (USGDF: $0.18 vs. VLCJF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: USGDF and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: USGDF: 103% vs. VLCJF: 15%
Market capitalization -- USGDF: $39.08M vs. VLCJF: $25.13M
USGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $39.08M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

USGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • USGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, USGDF is a better buy in the long-term than VLCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

USGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLCJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • USGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VLCJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLCJF is a better buy in the short-term than USGDF.

Price Growth

USGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USGDF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than VLCJF($25.1M). VLCJF (28.037) and USGDF (27.929) have similar YTD gains . USGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.48M vs. VLCJF (-1.3M). USGDF has more cash in the bank: 10.1M vs. VLCJF (1.42M). VLCJF has less debt than USGDF: VLCJF (46.5K) vs USGDF (2.2M). USGDF (0) and VLCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
USGDFVLCJFUSGDF / VLCJF
Capitalization39.1M25.1M156%
EBITDA3.48M-1.3M-267%
Gain YTD27.92928.037100%
P/E Ratio24.61N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.1M1.42M713%
Total Debt2.2M46.5K4,725%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
USGDF vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
USGDF
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (70). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (93). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (46). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLCJF (100). This means that USGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
USGDFVLCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WYGPY8.16N/A
N/A
Worley Ltd.
STGXF6.21N/A
N/A
Smartgroup Corp Ltd.
NSRCF0.32N/A
-1.01%
Nextsource Materials Inc.
HPGLY74.79-3.30
-4.22%
Hapag-Llyod AG
AAUGF0.03N/A
-6.25%
AERO ENERGY LTD.

USGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USGDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USGDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USGDF
1D Price
Change %
USGDF100%
-4.84%
NSUPF - USGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
BCEKF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
CBGZF - USGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
VITFF - USGDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - USGDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and VGMIF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and VGMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VITFF - VLCJF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - VLCJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VAUCF - VLCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
USGDF - VLCJF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%