USGDF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.08M
VLCJF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
26.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

USGDF vs VLCJF

Header iconUSGDF vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts USGDF vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
American Pacific Mining
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$509.75K
Capitalization30.08M
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization26.36M
USGDF vs VLCJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
USGDF vs. VLCJF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is USGDF is a Hold and VLCJF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (USGDF: $0.14 vs. VLCJF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: USGDF and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: USGDF: 82% vs. VLCJF: 45%
Market capitalization -- USGDF: $30.08M vs. VLCJF: $26.36M
USGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $30.08M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $26.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

USGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • USGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, USGDF is a better buy in the long-term than VLCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

USGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLCJF’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • USGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VLCJF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLCJF is a better buy in the short-term than USGDF.

Price Growth

USGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.20% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USGDF($30.1M) has a higher market cap than VLCJF($26.4M). VLCJF YTD gains are higher at: 28.008 vs. USGDF (-1.429). USGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.14M vs. VLCJF (-1.27M). USGDF has more cash in the bank: 6.19M vs. VLCJF (328K). VLCJF has less debt than USGDF: VLCJF (24.8K) vs USGDF (1.74M). USGDF (0) and VLCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
USGDFVLCJFUSGDF / VLCJF
Capitalization30.1M26.4M114%
EBITDA2.14M-1.27M-169%
Gain YTD-1.42928.008-5%
P/E Ratio19.10N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.19M328K1,886%
Total Debt1.74M24.8K6,996%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
USGDF vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
USGDF
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1655

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (65). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (95). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (63). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLCJF (100). This means that USGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
USGDFVLCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MODVQ0.19N/A
N/A
ModivCare Inc.
ASBFY26.93N/A
N/A
Associated British Foods plc
BLWYF31.44N/A
N/A
Bellway Plc.
ORENF4.65N/A
N/A
Origin Enterprises PLC
GIPIF2.33N/A
N/A
GREEN IMPACT PARTNERS INC

USGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USGDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USGDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USGDF
1D Price
Change %
USGDF100%
N/A
NSUPF - USGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCEKF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBGZF - USGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - USGDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - USGDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and VGMIF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and VGMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - VLCJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VAUCF - VLCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGDF - VLCJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A