UNCFF
Price
$76.50
Change
-$1.16 (-1.49%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
117.5B
UNIF
Price
$3.80
Change
+$0.20 (+5.56%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
20.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

UNCFF vs UNIF

Header iconUNCFF vs UNIF Comparison
Open Charts UNCFF vs UNIFBanner chart's image
UniCredito Spa
Price$76.50
Change-$1.16 (-1.49%)
Volume$2.44K
Capitalization117.5B
U & I Financial
Price$3.80
Change+$0.20 (+5.56%)
Volume$456
Capitalization20.81M
UNCFF vs UNIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UNCFF vs. UNIF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UNCFF is a Hold and UNIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (UNCFF: $76.50 vs. UNIF: $3.80)
Brand notoriety: UNCFF and UNIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UNCFF: 100% vs. UNIF: 21%
Market capitalization -- UNCFF: $117.5B vs. UNIF: $20.81M
UNCFF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $117.5B. UNIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UNCFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the long-term than UNIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UNCFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the short-term than UNIF.

Price Growth

UNCFF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while UNIF (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($117B) has a higher market cap than UNIF($20.8M). UNCFF has higher P/E ratio than UNIF: UNCFF (9.88) vs UNIF (3.19). UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 91.168 vs. UNIF (14.804). UNIF has less debt than UNCFF: UNIF (20M) vs UNCFF (128B). UNCFF has higher revenues than UNIF: UNCFF (26.7B) vs UNIF (12.4M).
UNCFFUNIFUNCFF / UNIF
Capitalization117B20.8M562,500%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD91.16814.804616%
P/E Ratio9.883.19310%
Revenue26.7B12.4M215,323%
Total CashN/A31.1M-
Total Debt128B20M640,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UNCFF vs UNIF: Fundamental Ratings
UNCFF
UNIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8632
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1490
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNIF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNCFF (68). This means that UNIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (100). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (98). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as UNIF (52). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (90). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UNCFFUNIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRNWF0.180.01
+7.88%
Greenlane Renewables Inc.
GWTR0.03N/A
N/A
Global Water Technologies, Inc.
MPFRF3.60N/A
N/A
Mapfre SA
SEIGY3.92N/A
N/A
Semperit Ag Holding
VLEEY5.94-0.07
-1.20%
Valeo SE

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-1.50%
ISNPY - UNCFF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CRZBY - UNCFF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
MDIBY - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
BKRIF - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNIF and FMOO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNIF and FMOO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNIF
1D Price
Change %
UNIF100%
N/A
FMOO - UNIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - UNIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - UNIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
TYFG - UNIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBAB - UNIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More