UNBLF
Price
$101.44
Change
+$0.71 (+0.70%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.75B
WRDEF
Price
$16.00
Change
+$1.00 (+6.67%)
Updated
Feb 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

UNBLF vs WRDEF

Header iconUNBLF vs WRDEF Comparison
Open Charts UNBLF vs WRDEFBanner chart's image
Unibail-Rodamco SE
Price$101.44
Change+$0.71 (+0.70%)
Volume$21
Capitalization14.75B
Wereldhave
Price$16.00
Change+$1.00 (+6.67%)
Volume$511
Capitalization1.01B
UNBLF vs WRDEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UNBLF vs. WRDEF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UNBLF is a StrongBuy and WRDEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (UNBLF: $101.44 vs. WRDEF: $16.00)
Brand notoriety: UNBLF and WRDEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UNBLF: 16% vs. WRDEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- UNBLF: $14.75B vs. WRDEF: $1.01B
UNBLF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $14.75B. WRDEF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UNBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UNBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRDEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNBLF is a better buy in the long-term than WRDEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UNBLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UNBLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

UNBLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while WRDEF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.91% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNBLF($14.7B) has a higher market cap than WRDEF($1.01B). UNBLF has higher P/E ratio than WRDEF: UNBLF (16.18) vs WRDEF (5.35). UNBLF YTD gains are higher at: 37.041 vs. WRDEF (6.667). UNBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. WRDEF (142M). UNBLF has more cash in the bank: 3.31B vs. WRDEF (25M). WRDEF has less debt than UNBLF: WRDEF (1.08B) vs UNBLF (24.7B). UNBLF has higher revenues than WRDEF: UNBLF (3.21B) vs WRDEF (203M).
UNBLFWRDEFUNBLF / WRDEF
Capitalization14.7B1.01B1,460%
EBITDA2.36B142M1,663%
Gain YTD37.0416.667556%
P/E Ratio16.185.35302%
Revenue3.21B203M1,581%
Total Cash3.31B25M13,228%
Total Debt24.7B1.08B2,281%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UNBLF vs WRDEF: Fundamental Ratings
UNBLF
WRDEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4838
SMR RATING
1..100
9886
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRDEF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNBLF (43). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (48). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (98). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDEF (57). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to WRDEF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNBLF (100). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UNBLFWRDEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
57%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPBT0.600.02
+3.81%
Purple Biotech Ltd
CCU11.970.25
+2.13%
Compania Cervecerias Unidas SA
DAVA8.890.09
+1.02%
Endava plc
XTNT0.64N/A
+0.53%
Xtant Medical Holdings
SQM44.24-0.22
-0.49%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA

UNBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNBLF and CHTH have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNBLF and CHTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBLF
1D Price
Change %
UNBLF100%
+0.70%
CHTH - UNBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATRRF - UNBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDPSF - UNBLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
DBMBF - UNBLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
RIOCF - UNBLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More