Advertisement
UMEWF vs VTSYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UMEWF is a Hold and VTSYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
UMEWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVTSYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- UMEWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VTSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
UMEWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTSYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- UMEWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- VTSYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
UMEWF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VTSYF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| UMEWF | VTSYF | UMEWF / VTSYF | |
| Capitalization | 47.1M | 1.42B | 3% |
| EBITDA | -148.96K | 96.2M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -37.500 | -13.201 | 284% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 217.39 | - |
| Revenue | 4 | 6.34B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 8.47K | 555M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.36M | 661M | 0% |
UMEWF | VTSYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VTSYF's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (98). This means that VTSYF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.
UMEWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as VTSYF (100). This means that UMEWF’s stock grew similarly to VTSYF’s over the last 12 months.
VTSYF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (97). This means that VTSYF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.
VTSYF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMEWF (91). This means that VTSYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.
VTSYF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (100). This means that VTSYF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.
| UMEWF | VTSYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 30% |
Advertisement
UMEWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UMEWF and VTSYF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMEWF and VTSYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMEWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMEWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VTSYF - UMEWF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TATYY - UMEWF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| TBLMF - UMEWF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WHGRF - UMEWF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TSUKY - UMEWF | 1% Poorly correlated | +4.28% | ||
More | ||||
VTSYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that VTSYF and SHVTF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VTSYF and SHVTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTSYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTSYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHVTF - VTSYF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOWG - VTSYF | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.64% | ||
| TSUKY - VTSYF | 8% Poorly correlated | +4.28% | ||
| UMEWF - VTSYF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TATYY - VTSYF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||