UG
Price
$8.37
Change
-$1.03 (-10.96%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
36.07M
VDAHF
Price
$2.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

UG vs VDAHF

Header iconUG vs VDAHF Comparison
Open Charts UG vs VDAHFBanner chart's image
United-Guardian
Price$8.37
Change-$1.03 (-10.96%)
Volume$23.44K
Capitalization36.07M
Vinda International Holdings
Price$2.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.16K
Capitalization2.43B
UG vs VDAHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UG vs. VDAHF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UG is a Hold and VDAHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (UG: $8.37 vs. VDAHF: $2.97)
Brand notoriety: UG and VDAHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UG: 398% vs. VDAHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- UG: $36.07M vs. VDAHF: $2.43B
UG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $36.07M. VDAHF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $2.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVDAHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VDAHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UG is a better buy in the long-term than VDAHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

UG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -6.01% price change this week, while VDAHF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.25% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VDAHF($2.43B) has a higher market cap than UG($36.1M). VDAHF has higher P/E ratio than UG: VDAHF (128.21) vs UG (14.02). VDAHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. UG (-7.154). VDAHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 222M vs. UG (2.97M). VDAHF has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. UG (9.09M). UG has less debt than VDAHF: UG (4.66K) vs VDAHF (4.01B). VDAHF has higher revenues than UG: VDAHF (19.8B) vs UG (10.9M).
UGVDAHFUG / VDAHF
Capitalization36.1M2.43B1%
EBITDA2.97M222M1%
Gain YTD-7.1540.000-
P/E Ratio14.02128.2111%
Revenue10.9M19.8B0%
Total Cash9.09M1.01B1%
Total Debt4.66K4.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UG vs VDAHF: Fundamental Ratings
UG
VDAHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
3793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
823
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UG's Valuation (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VDAHF (51) in the null industry. This means that UG’s stock grew somewhat faster than VDAHF’s over the last 12 months.

VDAHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as UG (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that VDAHF’s stock grew similarly to UG’s over the last 12 months.

UG's SMR Rating (37) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VDAHF (93) in the null industry. This means that UG’s stock grew somewhat faster than VDAHF’s over the last 12 months.

UG's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as VDAHF (71) in the null industry. This means that UG’s stock grew similarly to VDAHF’s over the last 12 months.

VDAHF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UG (82) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that VDAHF’s stock grew significantly faster than UG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UGVDAHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLAR3.930.11
+2.88%
Clarus Corp
SAN8.970.09
+1.01%
Banco Santander SA
GENI10.64-0.09
-0.84%
Genius Sports Limited
HMY14.03-0.19
-1.34%
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
MDAI2.60-0.11
-4.06%
Spectral AI

UG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UG and VDAHF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UG and VDAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UG
1D Price
Change %
UG100%
-8.52%
VDAHF - UG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACU - UG
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
UL - UG
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
EL - UG
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.18%
COTY - UG
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
More

VDAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VDAHF and CLX have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VDAHF and CLX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VDAHF
1D Price
Change %
VDAHF100%
N/A
CLX - VDAHF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
UG - VDAHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.52%
KVUE - VDAHF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
SKIN - VDAHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
UNLYF - VDAHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.10%
More