UBS
Price
$47.47
Change
+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
147.2B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$88.94
Change
-$0.31 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
276.01B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

UBS vs WFC

Header iconUBS vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts UBS vs WFCBanner chart's image
UBS Group AG
Price$47.47
Change+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Volume$24.03K
Capitalization147.2B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$88.94
Change-$0.31 (-0.35%)
Volume$179.42K
Capitalization276.01B
UBS vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UBS vs. WFC commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UBS is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (UBS: $47.29 vs. WFC: $89.25)
Brand notoriety: UBS: Not notable vs. WFC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UBS: 106% vs. WFC: 243%
Market capitalization -- UBS: $148.81B vs. WFC: $275.12B
UBS [@Major Banks] is valued at $148.81B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $275.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $833.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $144.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UBS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UBS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

UBS (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -5.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

UBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.12% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($276B) has a higher market cap than UBS($147B). UBS has higher P/E ratio than WFC: UBS (21.30) vs WFC (14.26). UBS YTD gains are higher at: 2.116 vs. WFC (-4.238). UBS has more cash in the bank: 223B vs. WFC (34.8B). WFC has less debt than UBS: WFC (214B) vs UBS (342B). WFC has higher revenues than UBS: WFC (82.8B) vs UBS (46.1B).
UBSWFCUBS / WFC
Capitalization147B276B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.116-4.238-50%
P/E Ratio21.3014.26149%
Revenue46.1B82.8B56%
Total Cash223B34.8B641%
Total Debt342B214B160%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UBS vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
UBS
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8578
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
710
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4124
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (81). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (10). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (6). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (41). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (72). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UBSWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONX27.291.91
+7.53%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF
LABU176.7111.82
+7.17%
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF
DIM82.250.27
+0.33%
WisdomTree International MidCap Div ETF
MART38.92-0.09
-0.23%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF
IWV393.13-1.54
-0.39%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-0.15%
BCS - UBS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
C - UBS
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
HSBC - UBS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
WFC - UBS
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
MUFG - UBS
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.83%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-4.61%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
-3.78%
C - WFC
81%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
JPM - WFC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
BK - WFC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More