TYNPF
Price
$37.09
Change
-$3.14 (-7.81%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.55B
ZEOOF
Price
$9.35
Change
+$0.25 (+2.75%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

TYNPF vs ZEOOF

Header iconTYNPF vs ZEOOF Comparison
Open Charts TYNPF vs ZEOOFBanner chart's image
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$37.09
Change-$3.14 (-7.81%)
Volume$824
Capitalization10.55B
Zeon
Price$9.35
Change+$0.25 (+2.75%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.3B
TYNPF vs ZEOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TYNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TYNPF vs. ZEOOF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TYNPF is a Hold and ZEOOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (TYNPF: $37.09 vs. ZEOOF: $9.35)
Brand notoriety: TYNPF and ZEOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TYNPF: 100% vs. ZEOOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- TYNPF: $10.55B vs. ZEOOF: $2.3B
TYNPF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $10.55B. ZEOOF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TYNPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZEOOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZEOOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYNPF is a better buy in the long-term than ZEOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TYNPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TYNPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

TYNPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.68% price change this week, while ZEOOF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than ZEOOF($2.3B). TYNPF has higher P/E ratio than ZEOOF: TYNPF (20.28) vs ZEOOF (11.29). TYNPF YTD gains are higher at: 27.026 vs. ZEOOF (2.747). TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 227B vs. ZEOOF (33.2B). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. ZEOOF (29.4B). ZEOOF has less debt than TYNPF: ZEOOF (9.55B) vs TYNPF (900B). TYNPF has higher revenues than ZEOOF: TYNPF (1.19T) vs ZEOOF (387B).
TYNPFZEOOFTYNPF / ZEOOF
Capitalization10.6B2.3B461%
EBITDA227B33.2B684%
Gain YTD27.0262.747984%
P/E Ratio20.2811.29180%
Revenue1.19T387B307%
Total Cash155B29.4B527%
Total Debt900B9.55B9,428%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZEOOF: Fundamental Ratings
ZEOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TYNPFZEOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TYNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGGAX87.800.59
+0.68%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth A
GMPPX38.890.25
+0.65%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value P
RSLCX68.710.33
+0.48%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
MRFGX23.710.06
+0.25%
BlackRock Capital Appreciation R
SCJIX8.080.02
+0.25%
Steward Covered Call Income I

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYNPF has been loosely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYNPF jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
-7.80%
CBT - TYNPF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
ASGLY - TYNPF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
OEC - TYNPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
TROX - TYNPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
SKFOF - TYNPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More

ZEOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZEOOF and CLZNF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZEOOF and CLZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZEOOF
1D Price
Change %
ZEOOF100%
N/A
CLZNF - ZEOOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REX - ZEOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
TYNPF - ZEOOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.80%
CNEY - ZEOOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
IMCDY - ZEOOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More