TYCMY
Price
$30.52
Change
-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHGLY
Price
$21.74
Change
-$0.13 (-0.59%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TYCMY vs WHGLY

Header iconTYCMY vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts TYCMY vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
Tingyi Cayman Islands Holdings
Price$30.52
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Volume$4.36K
Capitalization8.65B
WH Group
Price$21.74
Change-$0.13 (-0.59%)
Volume$21.4K
Capitalization14.1B
TYCMY vs WHGLY Comparison Chart in %
TYCMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TYCMY vs. WHGLY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TYCMY is a StrongBuy and WHGLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (TYCMY: $30.52 vs. WHGLY: $21.74)
Brand notoriety: TYCMY and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TYCMY: 98% vs. WHGLY: 84%
Market capitalization -- TYCMY: $8.65B vs. WHGLY: $14.1B
TYCMY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $8.65B. WHGLY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $261.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TYCMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TYCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the long-term than TYCMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TYCMY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TYCMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TYCMY is a better buy in the short-term than WHGLY.

Price Growth

TYCMY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.85% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGLY($14.1B) has a higher market cap than TYCMY($8.65B). TYCMY has higher P/E ratio than WHGLY: TYCMY (14.85) vs WHGLY (8.63). WHGLY YTD gains are higher at: 71.416 vs. TYCMY (24.817). TYCMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.06B vs. WHGLY (2.61B). TYCMY has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. WHGLY (1.83B). WHGLY has less debt than TYCMY: WHGLY (4.35B) vs TYCMY (15.2B). TYCMY has higher revenues than WHGLY: TYCMY (79.5B) vs WHGLY (27B).
TYCMYWHGLYTYCMY / WHGLY
Capitalization8.65B14.1B61%
EBITDA7.06B2.61B270%
Gain YTD24.81771.41635%
P/E Ratio14.858.63172%
Revenue79.5B27B294%
Total Cash13.1B1.83B715%
Total Debt15.2B4.35B349%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TYCMYWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TYCMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGNR42.260.46
+1.10%
American Beacon GLG Natrl Res ETF
DDIV40.530.34
+0.83%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF
CMCI26.030.11
+0.42%
VanEck® CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
PSC57.060.13
+0.23%
Principal US Small Cap ETF
BFRE29.66N/A
N/A
Westwood LBRTY Global Equity ETF

TYCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYCMY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYCMY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYCMY
1D Price
Change %
TYCMY100%
-1.77%
CIADY - TYCMY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
WHGLY - TYCMY
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
HAIN - TYCMY
23%
Poorly correlated
+11.81%
RKDA - TYCMY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
ARRT - TYCMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
More

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHGLY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHGLY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
+3.35%
CIADY - WHGLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
TYCMY - WHGLY
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
ASBFY - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
USNA - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
LSF - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
More