TUIFF
Price
$9.13
Change
+$0.13 (+1.44%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.65B
WOSSF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.04 (+36.36%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
81.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TUIFF vs WOSSF

Header iconTUIFF vs WOSSF Comparison
Open Charts TUIFF vs WOSSFBanner chart's image
TUI AG
Price$9.13
Change+$0.13 (+1.44%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.65B
Water Oasis Group
Price$0.15
Change+$0.04 (+36.36%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization81.37M
TUIFF vs WOSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TUIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TUIFF vs. WOSSF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TUIFF is a Hold and WOSSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (TUIFF: $9.13 vs. WOSSF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: TUIFF and WOSSF are both not notable
TUIFF represents the Consumer Sundries, while WOSSF is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TUIFF: 10% vs. WOSSF: 36%
Market capitalization -- TUIFF: $4.65B vs. WOSSF: $81.37M
TUIFF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $4.65B. WOSSF’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $81.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $179.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TUIFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWOSSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TUIFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WOSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOSSF is a better buy in the long-term than TUIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TUIFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOSSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TUIFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WOSSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WOSSF is a better buy in the short-term than TUIFF.

Price Growth

TUIFF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +1.44% price change this week, while WOSSF (@Personnel Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +41.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.14%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.31% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+2.78% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TUIFF($4.65B) has a higher market cap than WOSSF($81.4M). WOSSF has higher P/E ratio than TUIFF: WOSSF (9.33) vs TUIFF (5.98). WOSSF YTD gains are higher at: 41.827 vs. TUIFF (8.047). TUIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.39B vs. WOSSF (272M). TUIFF has more cash in the bank: 2.69B vs. WOSSF (633M). WOSSF has less debt than TUIFF: WOSSF (165M) vs TUIFF (2.55B). TUIFF has higher revenues than WOSSF: TUIFF (24.2B) vs WOSSF (972M).
TUIFFWOSSFTUIFF / WOSSF
Capitalization4.65B81.4M5,706%
EBITDA2.39B272M879%
Gain YTD8.04741.82719%
P/E Ratio5.989.3364%
Revenue24.2B972M2,490%
Total Cash2.69B633M426%
Total Debt2.55B165M1,545%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TUIFF vs WOSSF: Fundamental Ratings
TUIFF
WOSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
1343
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WOSSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUIFF (43). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

WOSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TUIFF (100). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TUIFF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WOSSF (43). This means that TUIFF’s stock grew similarly to WOSSF’s over the last 12 months.

WOSSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as TUIFF (57). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TUIFF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WOSSF (15). This means that TUIFF’s stock grew similarly to WOSSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TUIFFWOSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TUIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PROSY13.700.16
+1.18%
Prosus NV
MGPPF10.95N/A
N/A
Megaport Ltd
SKTP1625.00N/A
N/A
Skytop Lodge Corp.
ARRNF0.26N/A
-0.69%
American Rare Earths Ltd.
SMMYY7.82-0.11
-1.39%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.

TUIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TUIFF and TRZBF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TUIFF and TRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUIFF
1D Price
Change %
TUIFF100%
N/A
TRZBF - TUIFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OOBHF - TUIFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - TUIFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - TUIFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - TUIFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WOSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WOSSF and HSWLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOSSF and HSWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOSSF
1D Price
Change %
WOSSF100%
N/A
HSWLF - WOSSF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRZBF - WOSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDDF - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More