Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TUG vs UPAR
TUG vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TUG vs. UPAR commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TUG is a Hold and UPAR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPAR has more net assets: 66.6M vs. TUG (35.4M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than TUG: UPAR (6.600) vs TUG (0.042). TUG was incepted earlier than UPAR: TUG (4 years) vs UPAR (4 years). TUG (0.65) and UPAR (0.65) have comparable expense ratios . TUG has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| TUG | UPAR | TUG / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 0.042 | 6.600 | 1% |
| Net Assets | 35.4M | 66.6M | 53% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 12.00 | 433% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 3.09 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TUG | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
TUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUG has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TUG jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUG | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| KLAC - TUG | 76% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| NVDA - TUG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| AMZN - TUG | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MSFT - TUG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| LRCX - TUG | 73% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPAR has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPAR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | +1.67% | ||
| SHEL - UPAR | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | +9.30% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| AAL - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
More | ||||