TUFBY
Price
$6.12
Change
-$0.78 (-11.30%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

TUFBY vs WLMIF

Header iconTUFBY vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts TUFBY vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
Thai Union Group Public
Price$6.12
Change-$0.78 (-11.30%)
Volume$238
Capitalization1.76B
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization19.51B
TUFBY vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TUFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TUFBY vs. WLMIF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TUFBY is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (TUFBY: $6.12 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: TUFBY and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TUFBY: 225% vs. WLMIF: 3%
Market capitalization -- TUFBY: $1.76B vs. WLMIF: $19.51B
TUFBY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.76B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TUFBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TUFBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than TUFBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TUFBY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TUFBY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than TUFBY.

Price Growth

TUFBY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -12.57% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than TUFBY($1.76B). TUFBY has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: TUFBY (10.42) vs WLMIF (8.61). WLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 6.818 vs. TUFBY (-26.194). TUFBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. WLMIF (5.01B). TUFBY has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WLMIF (3.74B). WLMIF has less debt than TUFBY: WLMIF (32.3B) vs TUFBY (61.8B). TUFBY has higher revenues than WLMIF: TUFBY (152B) vs WLMIF (72.4B).
TUFBYWLMIFTUFBY / WLMIF
Capitalization1.76B19.5B9%
EBITDA12.2B5.01B243%
Gain YTD-26.1946.818-384%
P/E Ratio10.428.61121%
Revenue152B72.4B210%
Total Cash11.7B3.74B313%
Total Debt61.8B32.3B191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TUFBY vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
TUFBY
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9177
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8617
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TUFBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (13). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TUFBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (100). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TUFBY's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (99). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TUFBY (91). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TUFBY (86). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew significantly faster than TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TUFBYWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TUFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMPS2.770.11
+4.14%
COMPASS Pathways Plc
OVBC30.180.39
+1.31%
Ohio Valley Banc Corp
TYL581.103.90
+0.68%
Tyler Technologies
PENN18.280.02
+0.11%
PENN Entertainment
POAI0.83-0.03
-3.50%
Predictive Oncology

TUFBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TUFBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TUFBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUFBY
1D Price
Change %
TUFBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - TUFBY
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
TYCMY - TUFBY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RRSFF - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+8.10%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+17.84%
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More