TUFBY
Price
$6.00
Change
-$0.15 (-2.44%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

TUFBY vs WLMIF

Header iconTUFBY vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts TUFBY vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
Thai Union Group Public
Price$6.00
Change-$0.15 (-2.44%)
Volume$305
Capitalization1.48B
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization14.35B
TUFBY vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TUFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TUFBY vs. WLMIF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TUFBY is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (TUFBY: $6.00 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: TUFBY and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TUFBY: 23% vs. WLMIF: 92%
Market capitalization -- TUFBY: $1.48B vs. WLMIF: $14.35B
TUFBY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.48B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $238.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TUFBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TUFBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than TUFBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TUFBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TUFBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TUFBY and WLMIF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TUFBY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.73% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.3B) has a higher market cap than TUFBY($1.48B). WLMIF has higher P/E ratio than TUFBY: WLMIF (12.43) vs TUFBY (8.58). WLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 6.818 vs. TUFBY (-25.004).
TUFBYWLMIFTUFBY / WLMIF
Capitalization1.48B14.3B10%
EBITDAN/A4.45B-
Gain YTD-25.0046.818-367%
P/E Ratio8.5812.4369%
RevenueN/A69.3B-
Total CashN/A12.9B-
Total DebtN/A29.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TUFBY vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
TUFBY
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4433
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
7399
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5041

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TUFBY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (13). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TUFBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (100). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TUFBY's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (99). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TUFBY (64). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUFBY (80). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TUFBYWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TUFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTMQX24.040.14
+0.59%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Cor Eq R6
HNCFX19.910.11
+0.56%
Hartford International Growth F
MINFX38.640.14
+0.36%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R2
LGMNX26.380.07
+0.27%
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N
AVEAX16.95-0.12
-0.70%
Ave Maria Growth Focused

TUFBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TUFBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TUFBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUFBY
1D Price
Change %
TUFBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - TUFBY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
TYCMY - TUFBY
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
RRSFF - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
-0.36%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More