TTSRF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
42.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VULNF
Price
$3.33
Change
+$0.01 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TTSRF vs VULNF

Header iconTTSRF vs VULNF Comparison
Open Charts TTSRF vs VULNFBanner chart's image
Tartisan Nickel
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.67K
Capitalization42.74M
Vulcan Energy Resources
Price$3.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.30%)
Volume$460
Capitalization1.46B
TTSRF vs VULNF Comparison Chart in %
TTSRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VULNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TTSRF vs. VULNF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TTSRF is a Hold and VULNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (TTSRF: $0.28 vs. VULNF: $3.33)
Brand notoriety: TTSRF and VULNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TTSRF: 29% vs. VULNF: 15%
Market capitalization -- TTSRF: $42.74M vs. VULNF: $1.46B
TTSRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $42.74M. VULNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TTSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVULNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TTSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VULNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTSRF is a better buy in the long-term than VULNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TTSRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VULNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TTSRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VULNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TTSRF and VULNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TTSRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +44.72% price change this week, while VULNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.98% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VULNF($1.46B) has a higher market cap than TTSRF($42.7M). TTSRF YTD gains are higher at: 77.443 vs. VULNF (18.632).
TTSRFVULNFTTSRF / VULNF
Capitalization42.7M1.46B3%
EBITDA-808.14KN/A-
Gain YTD77.44318.632416%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash238N/A-
Total Debt22KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TTSRF: Fundamental Ratings
TTSRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TTSRFVULNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TTSRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VULNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOTVD0.680.01
+1.63%
Ascot Resources Ltd.
GPOVF6.50N/A
N/A
Grupo Carso S.A. de CV
DWMNF48.00N/A
N/A
Dowa Holdings Co., Ltd.
PCOFF0.33N/A
N/A
Pico Far East Holdings
UTRX0.02N/A
N/A
Unitronix Corp.

TTSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTSRF and ZNCXF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTSRF and ZNCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTSRF
1D Price
Change %
TTSRF100%
+0.79%
ZNCXF - TTSRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
SAVNF - TTSRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.33%
VULNF - TTSRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
TROUF - TTSRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+64.86%
EMGDF - TTSRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More

VULNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VULNF and FOSYF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VULNF and FOSYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VULNF
1D Price
Change %
VULNF100%
+0.30%
FOSYF - VULNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
PRMNF - VULNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TTSRF - VULNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
PXCLF - VULNF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
ZNCXF - VULNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
More